transaction.
How much is a possibility that
the LWLock to a subtransaction cause CSStorm?
best regards.
Katsuhiko Okano
okano katsuhiko _at_ oss ntt co jp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
out 5000.
when CSStrom occurrence, CS is about 7.
(CS is a value smaller than the case where H/T is ON.
I think that it is because the performance of CPU fell.)
Regards
Katsuhiko Okano
okano katsuhiko _at_ oss ntt co jp
---(end of broadcast)--
Hi.
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Katsuhiko Okano wrote:
>
> > I suspected conflict of BufMappingLock.
> > but, collected results are seen,
> > occurrence of CSStorm and the increase of BufMappingLock counts
> > seem not to correspond.
> > Instead, SubtransCont
Katsuhiko Okano wrote:
> By PostgreSQL8.2, NUM_SUBTRANS_BUFFERS was changed into 128
> and recompile and measured again.
> NOT occurrence of CSStorm. The value of WIPS was about 400.
measured again.
not occurrence when measured for 30 minutes.
but occurrence when measured for 3 hours, a
"Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" wrote:
> Katsuhiko Okano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It does not solve, even if it increases the number of NUM_SUBTRANS_BUFFERS.
> > The problem was only postponed.
>
> Can you provide a reproducible test case for thi
TPC-W implementation by OSDL.
>
>
> http://www.osdl.org/lab_activities/kernel_testing/osdl_database_test_suite/osdl_dbt-1/
Thank you for the information.
I'll try it.
Regards,
Katsuhiko Okano
okano katsuhiko _at_ oss ntt co jp
---(end of broadcast)
"Jim C. Nasby" wrote:
> If you haven't changed checkpoint timeout, this drop-off every 4-6
> minutes indicates that you need to make the bgwriter more aggressive.
I'll say to a customer when proposing and explaining.
Thank you for the information.
Regards,
Katsu
Hi,All.
Since the cause was found and the provisional patch was made
and solved about the CSStorm problem in previous mails, it reports.
> Subject: [HACKERS] poor performance with Context Switch Storm at TPC-W.
> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 20:09:24 +0900
> From: Katsuhiko Okano <[EMA
Katsuhiko Okano wrote:
> Since the cause was found and the provisional patch was made
> and solved about the CSStorm problem in previous mails, it reports.
(snip)
> (A) The algorithm which replaces a buffer is bad.
> A time stamp does not become new until swapout completes
> t
at isn't
> either clean or write-busy, if there is one;
Understanding is a difficult point although it is important.
Katsuhiko Okano
okano katsuhiko _at_ oss ntt co jp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
10 matches
Mail list logo
