Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-25 Thread Michael Paquier
On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Gavin Flower wrote: > On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: > [...] >> >> And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: >> Committed: 30. >> Moved to next CF: 42. >> Rejected: 9. >> Returned with Feedback: 22. >> Total: 103.

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-25 Thread David Fetter
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 09:45:40PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > > wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Gavin Flower
On 25/12/15 01:45, Michael Paquier wrote: [...] And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Regards, You didn't say how may regards... [More seriously] Many thanks to you, and the other Postgres

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Tomas Vondra
On 12/24/2015 04:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Michael Paquier writes: And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: Committed: 30. Moved to next CF: 42. Rejected: 9. Returned with Feedback: 22. Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Alexander Korotkov
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: > > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > > Committed: 30. > > Moved to next CF: 42. > > Rejected: 9. > > Returned with Feedback: 22. > > Total: 103. > > Many

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Michael Paquier
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 12:09 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier >> wrote: >>> OK, if those don't get

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-24 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > And the CF is no closed. Here is the final score: > Committed: 30. > Moved to next CF: 42. > Rejected: 9. > Returned with Feedback: 22. > Total: 103. Many thanks to Michael for doing the CF management work this time!

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-23 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:45 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier > wrote: >> OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next >> CF with the same status. > > After a first pass,

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-22 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > OK, if those don't get addressed soon, they will be moved to the next > CF with the same status. After a first pass, Numbers are getting down, I am just too tired to continue: Needs review: 13. Waiting on

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Paquier writes: > To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. Those are: : SQL function to report log message AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough to commit it. It's questionable whether we need such a feature at all, and it's

[HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Michael Paquier
Hi all, As of today, at the moment I am writing this message, here is the commit fest app status: Needs review: 20. Waiting on Author: 24. Ready for Committer: 4. Committed: 29. Moved to next CF: 11. Rejected: 8. Returned with Feedback: 7. Total: 103. This means in short that 48 out of 103

Re: [HACKERS] Commit fest status for 2015-11

2015-12-21 Thread Michael Paquier
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Paquier writes: >> To committers: there are 4 patches waiting for input. > > Those are: > > : SQL function to report log message > > AFAICT, there is no committer who likes this idea enough