"Gregory Maxwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There seems to be some behavior change in current CVS with respect to
> gist and gin indexes on varchar[]. Some side effect of the tsearch2
> merge?
I think more likely I broke it during the opfamily rewrite :-(. Looks
like I left out entries for _v
There seems to be some behavior change in current CVS with respect to
gist and gin indexes on varchar[]. Some side effect of the tsearch2
merge?
\d search_pages
Table "public.search_pages"
Column |Type | Modifiers
---+-+---
page_na
