I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
This thread, perhaps??
Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
There are others who think this has already happened.
--
Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
There are others who think this has already happened.
Well, I
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other
client utils? No?
There are
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with
Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to
change the name of pg_recvlogical,