[HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Josh Berkus
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Steve Crawford
On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? This thread, perhaps??

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? There are others who think this has already happened. -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Josh Berkus
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? There are others who think this has already happened. Well, I

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Andres Freund
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? There are

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Josh Berkus
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with

Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?

2014-05-20 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Josh Berkus wrote: On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical,