Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >>> Josh Berkus wrote: > I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > client utils? No? > >>> > >>> There are others who think this has already happened. > >> > >> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. > > > > It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's > > too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't > > particularly like the new name. > > I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any > > concensus for doing so either. > > Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it. Yes, I was quoting Douglas Adams. Sorry it was obscure: "There are some who believe that if the universe is ever completely understood, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more incomprehensible. There are others who think this has already happened..." -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
On 05/20/2014 12:38 PM, Andres Freund wrote: > On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: >> On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: >>> Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? >>> >>> There are others who think this has already happened. >>> >> >> Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. > > It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's > too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't > particularly like the new name. > I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any > concensus for doing so either. Ah, I see. There was a name change, and I lost the argument. Got it. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
On 2014-05-20 12:33:20 -0400, Josh Berkus wrote: > On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Josh Berkus wrote: > >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > >> client utils? No? > > > > There are others who think this has already happened. > > > > Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. It was named pg_receivelogical initially. Then people argued that that's too long and voted for pg_recvlogical. I renamed it even though I didn't particularly like the new name. I fail to see the point in renaming it again. And I haven't seen any concensus for doing so either. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
On 05/20/2014 12:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Josh Berkus wrote: >> I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to >> change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other >> client utils? No? > > There are others who think this has already happened. > Well, I just compiled beta1, and it's still called recvlogical. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
Josh Berkus wrote: > I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to > change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other > client utils? No? There are others who think this has already happened. -- Álvaro Herrerahttp://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
On 05/20/2014 08:48 AM, Josh Berkus wrote: I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? This thread, perhaps?? http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20130923084634.ga15...@awork2.anarazel.de Cheers, Steve -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
[HACKERS] I thought we were changing the name of recvlogical?
I can't find the thread now, but I'm pretty sure that we decided to change the name of pg_recvlogical, because its inconsistent with other client utils? No? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
