Re: [HACKERS] Leftover member in openssl part of Port struct

2016-08-31 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
> On 31 Aug 2016, at 15:12, Tom Lane wrote: > > Daniel Gustafsson writes: >> When SSL renegotiation was removed in 426746b9 the only consumer of the >> openssl >> specific count member in the Port struct was removed, but the member was left >> together with a few updates to it which are unused

Re: [HACKERS] Leftover member in openssl part of Port struct

2016-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
Daniel Gustafsson writes: > When SSL renegotiation was removed in 426746b9 the only consumer of the > openssl > specific count member in the Port struct was removed, but the member was left > together with a few updates to it which are unused. Attached patch removes > the > leftovers which now

[HACKERS] Leftover member in openssl part of Port struct

2016-08-31 Thread Daniel Gustafsson
When SSL renegotiation was removed in 426746b9 the only consumer of the openssl specific count member in the Port struct was removed, but the member was left together with a few updates to it which are unused. Attached patch removes the leftovers which now serves no purpose unless I’m missing some