On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:17:09PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> >> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
> >> eliminate. If not, can you post them please?
> > They all appear harmless.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
>> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
>> eliminate. If not, can you post them please?
> They all appear harmless.
The reason those "uninitialized variable" warnings got away from u
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:11:07AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> If that hit you then we're gonna get a few more people trip the same
>> way. Do you have any suggestions as to how to avoid that experience for
>> others?
> I believe the release notes are inadequate. I've
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:01:40AM -0500, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 01:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Compiled fine. Still a few warnings (using Fedora Core 6 / AMD64).
> Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
> eliminate. If not, can you post them p
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 01:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Compiled fine. Still a few warnings (using Fedora Core 6 / AMD64).
Presumably those are just the standard warnings we can't easiy
eliminate. If not, can you post them please?
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)--
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 09:11:07AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 01:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > The new PG_MAGIC_MODULE requirement threw me for a loop. I expect it
> > will catch others off guard as well.
> Did you find the documentation adequate? Could you locate wh
On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 01:15 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The new PG_MAGIC_MODULE requirement threw me for a loop. I expect it
> will catch others off guard as well.
Did you find the documentation adequate? Could you locate what you
needed to know quickly and accurately? Do you think the chan
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 01:15:51AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> One of my complicated queries that I threw at it seems to run about
> 10% - 20% faster now, which is pretty sweet.
I take this back. I forgot to 'analyze'. After 'analyze', the times
returned to the slower 8.1 times. :-(
I will
Compiled fine. Still a few warnings (using Fedora Core 6 / AMD64).
The new PG_MAGIC_MODULE requirement threw me for a loop. I expect it
will catch others off guard as well.
One of my complicated queries that I threw at it seems to run about
10% - 20% faster now, which is pretty sweet.
The multil
