This is raw, in case anyone wants to look more closely.
alvherre=# select level, count(*), patch, subject from scary left join commits
on patch = sha1 group by level, patch, subject order by level asc, count(*)
desc;
┌───┬───┬──
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> "Parallel Query" got many mentions; some of them were specific commits
> (such as "parallel infrastructure", "parallel joins", "parallel
> aggregates") and others were more generic. For the generic mentions I
> just chose a few of the most salient patches, but didn't inclu
Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:37:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > The RMT will publish aggregate, unattributed results after the poll
> > closes.
Here are some more detailed results. We got 15 valid replies. One
person voted twice, mentioning the same patches both times in
On 05/04/2016 06:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:37:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> The RMT will publish aggregate, unattributed results after the poll
>>> closes.
>>
>> Thanks for voting. Join me in congratulating
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:37:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> The RMT will publish aggregate, unattributed results after the poll
>> closes.
>
> Thanks for voting. Join me in congratulating our top finishers:
>
> 1. fd31cd2 Dont vacuum all-
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:37:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The RMT will publish aggregate, unattributed results after the poll
> closes.
Thanks for voting. Join me in congratulating our top finishers:
1. fd31cd2 Dont vacuum all-frozen pages.
2. "Parallel Query"
3(tie). 3fc6e2d Make the up
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 03:37:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The PostgreSQL Project needs you!
>
> The Release Management Team would like your input regarding the patch or
> patches which, in your opinion, are the most likely sources of major
> bugs or instabilities in PostgreSQL 9.6.
>
> Pl
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:06:55PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
> > Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> >> I would have appreciated more scope to say how confident I am in
> >> my prediction, and how scary in absolute terms I consider the
> >> scariest patches to be.
>
> > It was purposef
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
> This guy reads my mind. Where's my tinfoil hat?
Heh. Well, I'm generally not in favor of communicating concerns
without an obligation to defend them, but it could work well in tiny
doses. Offering hackers a low-risk way to take a position
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> I would have appreciated more scope to say how confident I am in my
>> prediction, and how scary in absolute terms I consider the scariest
>> patches to be.
> It was purposefully ambiguous. Maybe it should have been stated
> explicitely.
I was
Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> > We should send the owner of the scariest patch something as a prize.
> > Maybe a plastic skeleton or something ...
>
> I think it was a good idea to call it the scariest patch rather than
> something more severe soun
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
> We should send the owner of the scariest patch something as a prize.
> Maybe a plastic skeleton or something ...
I think it was a good idea to call it the scariest patch rather than
something more severe sounding. Having the poll only be half-
On 04/18/2016 04:22 PM, Josh berkus wrote:
>
> We should send the owner of the scariest patch something as a prize.
> Maybe a plastic skeleton or something ...
A mouse.
-Chap
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://ww
On 04/18/2016 11:37 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hackers, lurkers,
>
> The PostgreSQL Project needs you!
>
> The Release Management Team would like your input regarding the patch or
> patches which, in your opinion, are the most likely sources of major
> bugs or instabilities in PostgreSQL 9.6.
>
On Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:37:21 -0300
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hackers, lurkers,
>
> The PostgreSQL Project needs you!
>
> The Release Management Team would like your input regarding the patch or
> patches which, in your opinion, are the most likely sources of major
> bugs or instabilities in Postg
Hackers, lurkers,
The PostgreSQL Project needs you!
The Release Management Team would like your input regarding the patch or
patches which, in your opinion, are the most likely sources of major
bugs or instabilities in PostgreSQL 9.6.
Please submit your answers before May 1st using this form:
ht
16 matches
Mail list logo