Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 26 September 2017 at 00:42, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > That's a relatively minor point, however, and I do feel that this patch
> > is a definite improvement. Were you thinking of just applying this for
> > v10, or back-patching all or par
On 26 September 2017 at 00:42, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Attached is a proposed patch...
>
> I've taken a look through this and generally agree with it.
Thanks for looking at this.
> the bits inside ... tags should be
> consistently capitalized
Dean,
* Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rash...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 5 August 2017 at 10:03, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > Patch applies cleanly, make html ok, new table looks good to me.
>
> So I started looking at this patch, but before even considering the
> new table proposed, I think there are multiple i
On 5 August 2017 at 10:03, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> Patch applies cleanly, make html ok, new table looks good to me.
>
So I started looking at this patch, but before even considering the
new table proposed, I think there are multiple issues that need to be
resolved with the current docs:
Firstly,
Hello Rod,
Patch applies cleanly, make html ok, new table looks good to me.
I've turned it "Ready for Committer".
Thanks!
--
Fabien.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Rod,
>
> This version of the table attempts to stipulate which section of the
>> process the rule applies to.
>>
>
> The table should be referenced from the description, something like "Table
> xxx summarizes the ..."
>
Added the be
Hello Rod,
This version of the table attempts to stipulate which section of the
process the rule applies to.
A few comments about this patch. It applies cleanly, make html is ok.
It adds a summary table which shows for each case what happens. Although
the information can be guessed/infered
Of course, better thoughts appear immediately after hitting the send button.
This version of the table attempts to stipulate which section of the
process the rule applies to.
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:40 PM, Rod Taylor wrote:
> I think the biggest piece missing is something to summarize the gia
I think the biggest piece missing is something to summarize the giant
blocks of text.
Attached is a table that has commands and policy types, and a "yes" if it
applies.
--
Rod Taylor
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_policy.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_policy.sgml
index 3b24e5e95e..c737f9e8