Re: [HACKERS] Tidied up patch status page

2007-07-07 Thread Greg Smith
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007, Tom Lane wrote: I think you lost at least one patch in this change, viz "Maintaining cluster order on insert" It's back. I double-checked: 40 patches before, 40 now. I thought that I was safe editing this bugger at 5am, but Stefan was watching; I think I lost that one

Re: [HACKERS] Tidied up patch status page

2007-07-07 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in > before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by > the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. I think

Re: [HACKERS] Tidied up patch status page

2007-07-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Greg Smith wrote: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in > before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by > the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. Yep, much better. I think w

Re: [HACKERS] Tidied up patch status page

2007-07-07 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
Greg Smith wrote: > I'm not sure what order the patches at at > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed > in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted > by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. well the original order was bas

[HACKERS] Tidied up patch status page

2007-07-07 Thread Greg Smith
I'm not sure what order the patches at at http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php/Todo:PatchStatus were listed in before, but it seemed to me they'd be a whole lot more useful sorted by the remaining actions on them--so that's what I did. -- * Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gregsmit