Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote: Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong. Yeah, I did -- which I why when I reported it initially I assumed that a build problem wasn't the cause. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 21:29, Tom Lane wrote: Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong. Yeah, I did -- which I why when I reported it initially I assumed that a build problem wasn't the cause. Hm. One of the reasons I don't use --enable-depend is that I don't trust it ;-) --- I prefer to do a make clean and rebuild after every cvs update. It's disturbing that we both saw similar failures, when there's no obvious explanation for a build problem in the CVS logs. I have a sneaking feeling that we haven't seen the last of this issue. But with no ability to reproduce it, there's not much point in worrying now. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Yipes. I have not been running the parallel tests (my habit is to run make installcheck, instead) but there is clearly something busted. I got a bunch of failures similar to yours in my first attempt with make check on HPUX --- see attached. Any ideas on what the cause might be? No. Can anyone offer data on when this started? I see passes on March 2nd, updated and see passes today. Did 5 runs of make check on today source. -- Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
I said: Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by running make check over and over again until the problem crops up. Yipes. I have not been running the parallel tests (my habit is to run make installcheck, instead) but there is clearly something busted. I've spent the morning trying to reproduce this, without success. After a make maintainer-clean, cvs update, full rebuild cycle, I cannot get anything funny to happen in make check under HPUX, RH Linux 8.0, or OS X. I'm a bit hesitant to write it off as a build problem, because (a) I can't see anything in the recent CVS logs that might cause such, and (b) it's surprising that it'd bite both you and me. But at this point I don't see what else to say. Can you still reproduce the problem after a clean rebuild? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Tom Lane wrote: I've spent the morning trying to reproduce this, without success. After a make maintainer-clean, cvs update, full rebuild cycle, I cannot get anything funny to happen in make check under HPUX, RH Linux 8.0, or OS X. I'm a bit hesitant to write it off as a build problem, because (a) I can't see anything in the recent CVS logs that might cause such, and (b) it's surprising that it'd bite both you and me. But at this point I don't see what else to say. Can you still reproduce the problem after a clean rebuild? FWIW, I just updated to cvs tip, did make clean ./configure ... make all make install make check (repeated 6 times) The only failure I get is horology due to the --enable-integer-datetimes issue (which I think there is a patch in the queue for). This is on Red Hat 7.3. Joe ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:41, Tom Lane wrote: Can you still reproduce the problem after a clean rebuild? No -- I ran cvs update, make clean, followed by 10 runs of the regression tests but I didn't get any similar failures. I suppose we can just regard it as a build problem, then? Not sure what the actual culprit was, though... Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I suppose we can just regard it as a build problem, then? Not sure what the actual culprit was, though... I'm mystified too. But unless we see it again, I think we have to write it off as a build error. Do you use --enable-depend when configuring? I don't, so I know that I take some risk of build errors when I do things wrong. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
[HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
running make check over and over again until the problem crops up.
The platform is Linux 2.4, gcc 3.2. I've attached the regression.diffs
file.
Any ideas on what the cause might be?
Cheers,
Neil
--
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
*** ./expected/triggers.out Sat Nov 23 13:13:22 2002
--- ./results/triggers.out Fri Mar 7 15:48:41 2003
***
*** 88,93
--- 88,94
NOTICE: check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys2 are deleted
DROP TABLE pkeys;
DROP TABLE fkeys;
+ ERROR: DeleteRelationTuple: cache lookup failed for relation 122479
DROP TABLE fkeys2;
-- -- I've disabled the funny_dup17 test because the new semantics
-- -- of AFTER ROW triggers, which get now fired at the end of a
==
*** ./expected/inherit.out Thu Mar 6 00:47:52 2003
--- ./results/inherit.out Fri Mar 7 15:48:41 2003
***
*** 26,31
--- 26,32
INSERT INTO c(aa) VALUES('ccc');
INSERT INTO c(aa) VALUES('');
INSERT INTO d(aa) VALUES('ddd');
+ ERROR: Relation 125442 does not exist
INSERT INTO d(aa) VALUES('');
INSERT INTO d(aa) VALUES('d');
INSERT INTO d(aa) VALUES('dd');
***
*** 52,64
c | cc
c | ccc
c |
- d | ddd
d |
d | d
d | dd
d | ddd
d |
! (24 rows)
SELECT relname, b.* FROM b, pg_class where b.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb
--- 53,64
c | cc
c | ccc
c |
d |
d | d
d | dd
d | ddd
d |
! (23 rows)
SELECT relname, b.* FROM b, pg_class where b.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb
***
*** 69,81
b | bb |
b | bbb |
b | |
- d | ddd |
d | |
d | d|
d | dd |
d | ddd |
d | |
! (12 rows)
SELECT relname, c.* FROM c, pg_class where c.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| cc
--- 69,80
b | bb |
b | bbb |
b | |
d | |
d | d|
d | dd |
d | ddd |
d | |
! (11 rows)
SELECT relname, c.* FROM c, pg_class where c.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| cc
***
*** 86,109
c | cc |
c | ccc |
c | |
- d | ddd |
d | |
d | d|
d | dd |
d | ddd |
d | |
! (12 rows)
SELECT relname, d.* FROM d, pg_class where d.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb | cc | dd
-+--+++
- d | ddd |||
d | |||
d | d|||
d | dd |||
d | ddd |||
d | |||
! (6 rows)
SELECT relname, a.* FROM ONLY a, pg_class where a.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa
--- 85,106
c | cc |
c | ccc |
c | |
d | |
d | d|
d | dd |
d | ddd |
d | |
! (11 rows)
SELECT relname, d.* FROM d, pg_class where d.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb | cc | dd
-+--+++
d | |||
d | d|||
d | dd |||
d | ddd |||
d | |||
! (5 rows)
SELECT relname, a.* FROM ONLY a, pg_class where a.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa
***
*** 141,153
SELECT relname, d.* FROM ONLY d, pg_class where d.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb | cc | dd
-+--+++
- d | ddd |||
d | |||
d | d|||
d | dd |||
d | ddd |||
d | |||
! (6 rows)
UPDATE a SET aa='' WHERE aa='';
UPDATE ONLY a SET aa='z' WHERE aa='a';
--- 138,149
SELECT relname, d.* FROM ONLY d, pg_class where d.tableoid = pg_class.oid;
relname |aa| bb | cc | dd
-+--+++
d | |||
d | d|||
d | dd |||
d | ddd |||
d
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by running make check over and over again until the problem crops up. The platform is Linux 2.4, gcc 3.2. I've attached the regression.diffs file. Any ideas on what the cause might be? Hardware? If it's a software bug, you'd generally expect it to happen each and every time... -Doug ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 17:05, Doug McNaught wrote: Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by running make check over and over again until the problem crops up. The platform is Linux 2.4, gcc 3.2. I've attached the regression.diffs file. Any ideas on what the cause might be? Hardware? If it's a software bug, you'd generally expect it to happen each and every time... It could be an order dependency in a parallel group. The sequential runs don't throw a periodic error do they? -- Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key: http://www.rbt.ca/rbtpub.asc signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [HACKERS] regression failure in CVS HEAD
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
About 1 in every 5 runs of the (parallel) regression tests are failing
for me with CVS HEAD: the triggers, inherit, vacuum, sanity_check, and
misc tests fail. I can make the failures occur fairly consistently by
running make check over and over again until the problem crops up.
Yipes. I have not been running the parallel tests (my habit is to run
make installcheck, instead) but there is clearly something busted.
I got a bunch of failures similar to yours in my first attempt with
make check on HPUX --- see attached.
Any ideas on what the cause might be?
No. Can anyone offer data on when this started?
regards, tom lane
*** ./expected/constraints.out Sat Mar 8 00:16:33 2003
--- ./results/constraints.out Sat Mar 8 00:21:00 2003
***
*** 11,31
--
CREATE TABLE DEFAULT_TBL (i int DEFAULT 100,
x text DEFAULT 'vadim', f float8 DEFAULT 123.456);
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (1, 'thomas', 57.0613);
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (1, 'bruce');
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL (i, f) VALUES (2, 987.654);
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL (x) VALUES ('marc');
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (3, null, 1.0);
SELECT '' AS five, * FROM DEFAULT_TBL;
! five | i | x|f
! --+-++-
! | 1 | thomas | 57.0613
! | 1 | bruce | 123.456
! | 2 | vadim | 987.654
! | 100 | marc | 123.456
! | 3 || 1
! (5 rows)
!
CREATE SEQUENCE DEFAULT_SEQ;
CREATE TABLE DEFAULTEXPR_TBL (i1 int DEFAULT 100 + (200-199) * 2,
i2 int DEFAULT nextval('default_seq'));
--- 11,29
--
CREATE TABLE DEFAULT_TBL (i int DEFAULT 100,
x text DEFAULT 'vadim', f float8 DEFAULT 123.456);
+ ERROR: cache lookup of relation 119389 failed
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (1, 'thomas', 57.0613);
+ ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (1, 'bruce');
+ ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL (i, f) VALUES (2, 987.654);
+ ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL (x) VALUES ('marc');
+ ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
INSERT INTO DEFAULT_TBL VALUES (3, null, 1.0);
+ ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
SELECT '' AS five, * FROM DEFAULT_TBL;
! ERROR: Relation default_tbl does not exist
CREATE SEQUENCE DEFAULT_SEQ;
CREATE TABLE DEFAULTEXPR_TBL (i1 int DEFAULT 100 + (200-199) * 2,
i2 int DEFAULT nextval('default_seq'));
==
*** ./expected/misc.out Sat Mar 8 00:16:33 2003
--- ./results/misc.out Sat Mar 8 00:21:52 2003
***
*** 590,596
d_star
date_tbl
default_seq
- default_tbl
defaultexpr_tbl
dept
e_star
--- 590,595
***
*** 659,665
toyemp
varchar_tbl
xacttest
! (95 rows)
--SELECT name(equipment(hobby_construct(text 'skywalking', text 'mer'))) AS
equip_name;
SELECT hobbies_by_name('basketball');
--- 658,664
toyemp
varchar_tbl
xacttest
! (94 rows)
--SELECT name(equipment(hobby_construct(text 'skywalking', text 'mer'))) AS
equip_name;
SELECT hobbies_by_name('basketball');
==
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
