Re: [HACKERS] unused_oids?
Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > At this moment the following is the list of the unused OIDs. For the > uuid datatype I use a script for generating catalog entries. I can close > some gaps there if the "masters" are okay with this. Are any OIDs > reserved for later or any range can be used in this case? My advice is not to try to fill in the gaps --- better to leave them there so that if any other objects are created that're related to the nearby ones, they can be assigned nearby OIDs. If you've got a patch that is going to use a bunch of OIDs for related purposes, it's better to use a contiguous chunk of OIDs for it. I believe that the bitmap-indexing patch is using OIDs starting at 3000 (at least that's the advice I gave them awhile back). If you need less than 50 you might start at 2950, else check that patch and start above whatever they used. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [HACKERS] unused_oids?
> uuid datatype I use a script for generating catalog entries. I can close > some gaps there if the "masters" are okay with this. Are any OIDs > reserved for later or any range can be used in this case? IMHO, better way is to use some high oids ( for example, starting from 8000 ) and before committing change they to lowest possible. Ehan HEAD is under hard development, oids change quickly, so you will need to rearrange your oids for each snapshot. -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
[HACKERS] unused_oids?
Folks, At this moment the following is the list of the unused OIDs. For the uuid datatype I use a script for generating catalog entries. I can close some gaps there if the "masters" are okay with this. Are any OIDs reserved for later or any range can be used in this case? 2 - 9 32 86 - 88 90 100 193 - 199 276 321 - 328 376 432 - 433 820 - 828 1004 1972 - 1973 1980 1998 2003 - 2004 2039 2096 2230 2746 2758 - 2780 2858 - 2859 2922 - Regards, Gevik ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
