Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Joe Conway writes:
>> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
>> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
>> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
> The current statement can
Joe Conway writes:
> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
The current statement can be examined using the statistics views and
functio
Added to TODO:
* Promote debug_query_string into a server-side function
current_query()
---
Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>I was thinking something
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
Not unless you want to promote a quick debugg
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was thinking something similar. This exact question has come up at
> least three times in the last three months. I doubt we'd want a special
> keyword like CURRENT_QUERY, but maybe current_query()?
Not unless you want to promote a quick debugging hack,
--On Tuesday, June 24, 2003 14:07:23 -0700 Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
(moving to HACKERS)
Mike Mascari wrote:
Joe Conway wrote:
I think this shows how to do what you want:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2003-05/msg00301.php
Maybe debug_query_string should be mapped into a
(moving to HACKERS)
Mike Mascari wrote:
Joe Conway wrote:
I think this shows how to do what you want:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2003-05/msg00301.php
Maybe debug_query_string should be mapped into a variable like
CURRENT_USER? Perhaps something like CURRENT_QUERY?
I was thinking some
