Re: Re: [HACKERS] ¿¿¿past chunk end???

2006-11-01 Thread Tom Lane
"luis garcia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well about the changes I have made, they are working just fine. All the > structures length have been updated and as I said we added 7 new fields > to pg_class structure and there was no problem. The problem here is with > relfrequency only. pg_class is

Re: [HACKERS] ¿¿¿past chunk end???

2006-11-01 Thread luis garcia
Hi, thanks for your answers...>Carefully check all the palloc's you are doing in your code.>This warning is shown when you write some extra bytes to the memory>and size of your data goes beyond the allocated size. There's no problem in the memory allocation, just in relfrequency, that's the "Big Pr

Re: [HACKERS] ¿¿¿past chunk end???

2006-11-01 Thread imad
Carefully check all the palloc's you are doing in your code. This warning is shown when you write some extra bytes to the memory and size of your data goes beyond the allocated size. --Imad EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com) On 11/1/06, luis garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi We have been