On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:45:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Let's split the difference: how about we close it a week from this
> > Friday. ?That would be April 6, 2012, ten days from today.
>
> Anybody, anybody? Can we try to get some ag
Robert Haas writes:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Let's split the difference: how about we close it a week from this
>> Friday. That would be April 6, 2012, ten days from today.
> Anybody, anybody? Can we try to get some agreement on this?
Works for me.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Fine. What do you propose, specifically?
>>>
>>> The end of the month is coming up. How about we propose to close the
>>> 'fest on A
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Fine. What do you propose, specifically?
>>
>> The end of the month is coming up. How about we propose to close the
>> 'fest on April 1st? Anything that's not committable by then goes to
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Fine. What do you propose, specifically?
>
> The end of the month is coming up. How about we propose to close the
> 'fest on April 1st? Anything that's not committable by then goes to
> the 9.3 list. If one week seems too short, how about 2 we
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> This is probably a dumb question but... surely there's more than 2
>> committers able to review?
>
> Able and willing might be two different things. Alvaro, Heikki, and
> Magnus have all been looking at stuff, but I think
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:39, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> This is probably a dumb question but... surely there's more than 2
>> committers able to review?
>
> Able and willing might be two different things. Alvaro, Heikki, and
> Magnus have all been looking at
Robert Haas writes:
> On Mar 26, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Robert Haas writes:
>>> 2. I'm not sure which patches Tom is planning to look at or in what
>>> order, so I've been avoiding the ones he seems to be taking an
>>> interest in.
>> Well, I think I'm definitely on the hook for t
