Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Am Montag, 15. Oktober 2007 schrieb Marko Kreen: > > The CVS log message for that says "Allow PL/PythonU to compile on Python > > 2.5.", but that is evidently not true. Is this just a warning cleanup, > > or is there perhaps a 32 vs 64 bit issue that is being fixed there? > > It's a crash fix for 64bit python 2.5. Then we ought to backpatch that to 8.2. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch support for python 2.5?
On 10/15/07, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > I notice though that the > > second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why > > those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2 > > branch, eg wasp on 8.2: > > The CVS log message for that says "Allow PL/PythonU to compile on Python > 2.5.", but that is evidently not true. Is this just a warning cleanup, > or is there perhaps a 32 vs 64 bit issue that is being fixed there? It's a crash fix for 64bit python 2.5. -- marko ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Tom Lane wrote: > I notice though that the > second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why > those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2 > branch, eg wasp on 8.2: The CVS log message for that says "Allow PL/PythonU to compile on Python 2.5.", but that is evidently not true. Is this just a warning cleanup, or is there perhaps a 32 vs 64 bit issue that is being fixed there? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> I noticed that two of the buildfarm members are failing the 8.1 >> branch because they're trying to build plpython with python 2.5. To >> get that to work, I think we'd need to back-patch these two fixes: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00165.php >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00043.php >> Is that worth doing? Should we go further back than 8.1? > Those who need Python 2.5 can use PostgreSQL 8.2. Not being a Python user, I don't really care. I notice though that the second of the above-mentioned patches is only in HEAD, which is why those same machines are giving scary-looking warnings in the 8.2 branch, eg wasp on 8.2: ccache gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -fno-strict-aliasing -g -fpic -I. -I/usr/include/python2.5 -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE -I/usr/include/et -c -o plpython.o plpython.c plpython.c:1996: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type plpython.c:1998: warning: 'intargfunc' is deprecated plpython.c:1998: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type plpython.c:1999: warning: 'intargfunc' is deprecated plpython.c:1999: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type plpython.c:2000: warning: 'intintargfunc' is deprecated plpython.c:2000: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type plpython.c:2001: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type plpython.c:2002: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type Seems we should at least back-patch Marko's fixes into 8.2. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: [HACKERS] Back-patch support for python 2.5?
Tom Lane wrote: > I noticed that two of the buildfarm members are failing the 8.1 > branch because they're trying to build plpython with python 2.5. To > get that to work, I think we'd need to back-patch these two fixes: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2006-11/msg00165.php > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2007-04/msg00043.php > Is that worth doing? Should we go further back than 8.1? I find these patches a bit excessive for backporting, especially 10 minor releases into the branch. Those who need Python 2.5 can use PostgreSQL 8.2. I consider that to be a new feature. The fact that the buildfarm exercises other combinations isn't evidence of a practical need. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
