On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote: > If I recall correctly, Tom pointed out a while back that the comment > justifying the lockless read of the VM bit was not correct (or at least > not complete). > > I rewrote it, but it was part of a patch that was not accepted. Attached > is the comment patch only.
Looks reasonable to me. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
