Tom Lane writes:
> Why is that better than the other direction?
It isn't. Let's just keep committing to the head and merge it into 7.3
later.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Yes. We need a decision now because I don't know which branch to touch.
>> Marc, I need your feedback on these ideas. There is discussion about
>> fixing earthdistance. Perhaps we fix that and remove t
On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > >> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
> > >> issues and the branch will require double-patching.
> >
> > > Merge the ch
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> >> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
> >> issues and the branch will require double-patching.
>
> > Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
>> issues and the branch will require double-patching.
> Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is
> released.
Why is that be
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>
> > I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
> > issues and the branch will require double-patching.
>
> Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is
> released.
Yes, there is something to b
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I don't think we want a branch for 7.4 yet. We still have lots of open
> issues and the branch will require double-patching.
Merge the changes on the 7.3 branch into the 7.4 branch after 7.3 is
released.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Tom Lane wrote:
> Marc previously proposed releasing beta3 in about a week --- will that
> be a good time to open HEAD for 7.4 work, or will we need to delay still
> longer? (I'm not sure yet, myself.)
Perhaps it's too early to be able to effectively say when a
real+effective branch is likely t
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Marc, I know we said branch after beta2 but I think we need another week
> or two before we can start using that branch effectively. Even if we
> started using it, like adding PITR, the code would drift so much that
> the double-patching would start to
