Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD

2002-08-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Rod Taylor writes: Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2? Not sure if we should do this now. We're approaching the time where people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their carefully crafted DocBook installations. We're not going to realize any immediate

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD

2002-08-15 Thread Rod Taylor
Yes, after updating docs to the newer DTD I intend to make them XML compliant to ensure they work with v5 of docbook in the future. Ah, an XML vs. SGML debate. I look forward to it. This one is pretty simple. It's been announced that the docbook group isn't looking to continue with

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD

2002-08-15 Thread cbbrowne
Rod Taylor writes: Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2? Not sure if we should do this now. We're approaching the time where people should be writing documentation, not having to refiddle their carefully crafted DocBook installations. We're not going to realize any

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation DTD

2002-08-14 Thread Tom Lane
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Anyone mind if we bump the DTD version to Docbook 4.2? Peter E. is the gatekeeper on that, I think --- he pushed us to 4.1 not long ago. If Peter's okay with 4.2, then full speed ahead ... regards, tom lane PS: pgsql-docs is