On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 5:45 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming the command in
question can be stuffed inside a function, the most you're gaining is
a little notational convenience
I can answer that
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming the command in
question can be stuffed inside a function, the most you're gaining is
a little notational convenience
I can answer that one (why a full-blown mechanism for a notational convenience).
It has
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
Either I develop them separately, with separate branches derived from
the master one, or I develop them as a stack, one on top of the other.
The difference is my ability to provide a patch for one of the features
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Personally, I hate patches that do more than one thing. For me, the
time required to verify a patch goes as about O(n^2) in its size.
That's exactly why I'm opening that discussion. The main difference
between the approaches I can take is the time it
