On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
I think what would be more useful is if we could
somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
the author of a patch is not stored with the patch in any structured
way; it's just typed in, usually but not always as
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
I think what would be more useful is if we could
somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
the author of a patch is not stored with the patch in any structured
way; it's just typed
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:12:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
I think what would be more useful is if we could
somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
the author of a patch is
David Fetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 09:12:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Saturday 04 July 2009 00:54:11 Robert Haas wrote:
I think what would be more useful is if we could
somehow associated metadata with each commit. Right now, for example,
On Friday 03 July 2009 05:16:41 Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
Folks,
There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
commitfest, but there seems to be
Peter Eisentraut píše v pá 03. 07. 2009 v 09:19 +0300:
On Friday 03 July 2009 05:16:41 Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
Folks,
There's been a lot of discussion/argument
Robert Haas píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 22:16 -0400:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Also, how would we handle changes by committers, who
don't always go through the CommitFest process?
I think that all head patches should go to through a new tool for
Dickson S. Guedes lis...@guedesoft.net wrote:
pgcommitfest tables sctructure [1]?
[1]
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=pgcommitfest.git;a=blob;f=etc/table.sql;h=c60a298c863ef3e88dcfd16572781d2b435ca629;hb=HEAD
On minor quibble with this schema: I believe that session.login_time
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Robert Haas píše v čt 02. 07. 2009 v 22:16 -0400:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Also, how would we handle changes by committers, who
don't always go through the CommitFest
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,...the first CF on July 15th.
Would it make the CommitFest easier if there were an additional
column which indicates what CVS-version of Postgres the patch
cleanly applies to?
Perhaps a patch submitter could indicate the CVS date/time
with which he developed the
Ron Mayer wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
Folks,...the first CF on July 15th.
Would it make the CommitFest easier if there were an additional
column which indicates what CVS-version of Postgres the patch
cleanly applies to?
Perhaps a patch submitter could indicate the CVS date/time
with which he
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or something?
It's not in productions yet as It's not been documented or given a
public hostname/servicename, both of which are requirements for any
postgresql.org
On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or
something?
It's not in productions yet as It's not been documented or given a
public
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Robert, I have not reviewed your software. Do I need a login or
something?
It's not
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Dave Pagedp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:04 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Robert, I have not
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
I don't have loads of time in the coming days, but IIRC I've taken a glance at
a past version of the code, and would be willing to do so
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
I don't have loads of time in the coming days, but IIRC I've
Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:26:14 -0300, Brendan Jurd dire...@gmail.com
escreveu:
I imagine that migration would basically be converting the wiki data
into SQL, so I would need the database schema underlying the new CF
app.
How about parsing wiki content and create a migration script based on
Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:15:22 -0300, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
escreveu:
The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to migrate
the information from the Wiki to my app (which will involve a fair
amount of
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Dave Pagedp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Suggest a suitable name by which we can address the service (we don't
use the internal names like coridan because things can get moved
around), and I can
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Dickson S. Guedeslis...@guedesoft.net wrote:
Em Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:15:22 -0300, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
escreveu:
The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's been no code
review yet either, which would probably be a good idea.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 03:42:56PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Tolleyeggyk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:41:27AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
As far as I'm aware, there's
Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
Folks,
There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have
the first CF on July 15th.
Can we add flags like bump catalog version, bump page
So I currently have some free time as I'm currently between jobs. I
can start going through the queued patches in the next few weeks.
Should I be looking at the wiki currently? Or is your tool ready to
go?
--
greg
http://mit.edu/~gsstark/resume.pdf
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Greg Starkgsst...@mit.edu wrote:
So I currently have some free time as I'm currently between jobs. I
can start going through the queued patches in the next few weeks.
Should I be looking at the wiki currently? Or is your tool ready to
go?
Wiki for now. Brendan
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Zdenek Kotalazdenek.kot...@sun.com wrote:
Josh Berkus píše v st 01. 07. 2009 v 17:21 -0700:
Folks,
There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have
the first CF on
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Josh Berkusj...@agliodbs.com wrote:
There's been a lot of discussion/argument around how to handle the last
commitfest, but there seems to be a total consensus that we want to have the
first CF on July 15th.
I'd like Robert Haas to be the CF Manager for that
2009/7/2 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com:
The main problem is that my fine software only contains test data at
this point. If we have any volunteers who are available to migrate
the information from the Wiki to my app (which will involve a fair
amount of legwork),
As the original author of
31 matches
Mail list logo
