On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Rushabh Lathia
rushabh.lat...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/07/18 2:31), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp
wrote:
(2013/07/04 3:58),
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/07/04 3:58), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Since pg_relpages(oid) doesn't
(2013/07/18 2:31), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/07/04 3:58), Fujii Masao wrote:
For the test, I just implemented the regclass-version of pg_relpages()
(patch attached) and tested some cases. But I could not get that problem.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:40 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/07/18 2:31), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp
wrote:
(2013/07/04 3:58), Fujii Masao wrote:
For the test, I just implemented the regclass-version of
(2013/07/04 3:58), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Since pg_relpages(oid) doesn't exist, pg_relpages() is in the same
situation as pgstatindex(), i.e., we
Hi Rushabh,
(2013/07/16 14:58), Rushabh Lathia wrote:
Hello Satoshi,
I assigned myself for the reviewer of this patch. Issue status is waiting on
author.
Thank you for picking it up.
Now looking at the discussion under the thread it seems like we are waiting
for the suggestion for the new
Hi Satoshi,
I spent some time on the revised version on the
patch(pgstattuple_regclass_v2.diff)
and here are my comments.
.) Patch get applies cleanly on PG master branch
.) Successful build and database creation
.) Basic test coverage included in the patch
.) make check running cleanly
Hello Satoshi,
I assigned myself for the reviewer of this patch. Issue status is waiting on
author.
Now looking at the discussion under the thread it seems like we are waiting
for the suggestion for the new function name, right ?
I am wondering why actually we need new name ? Can't we just
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/06/17 4:02), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM,
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/06/17 4:02), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
It is obviously easy to keep two
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/06/17 4:02), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
It is obviously easy to keep two types of function interfaces,
one with regclass-type and another with
(2013/06/17 4:02), Fujii Masao wrote:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
It is obviously easy to keep two types of function interfaces,
one with regclass-type and another with text-type, in the next
release for backward-compatibility like below:
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp wrote:
(2013/03/05 22:46), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe this is acceptable collateral damage. I don't know. But we
definitely stand a chance of breaking
(2013/03/05 22:46), Robert Haas wrote:
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe this is acceptable collateral damage. I don't know. But we
definitely stand a chance of breaking applications if we change
pgstatindex like this. It might be better to invent a
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe this is acceptable collateral damage. I don't know. But we
definitely stand a chance of breaking applications if we change
pgstatindex like this. It might be better to invent a differently-named
function to replace
Satoshi Nagayasu sn...@uptime.jp writes:
My goal is to allow specifying a relation/index with several
expressions, 'relname', 'schemaname.relname' and oid in all
pgstattuple functions. pgstatindex() does not accept oid so far.
I have found that the backward-compatibility can be kept
when the
16 matches
Mail list logo
