On Jul 14, 2011, at 9:53 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
(2011/07/14 3:49), Thomas Lotterer wrote:
Thanks for the hint.
Our ftp daemon is dumping core.
We are debugging ...
Ah, good news, thanks.
Where should I report stuff like this in the future? I sent a message about
this to
Hi Thomas-san, Ralf-san.
I appreciate your great work.
Thanks!
CC to Postgres-ML.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
(2011/07/14 3:49), Thomas Lotterer wrote:
Thanks for the hint.
Our ftp daemon is dumping core.
We are debugging ...
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Jul 14, 2011, at 12:05 AM, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Hi Thomas-san, Ralf-san.
I appreciate your great work.
Thanks!
CC to Postgres-ML.
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
(2011/07/14 3:49), Thomas Lotterer wrote:
Thanks for the hint.
Our ftp daemon is dumping core.
We are debugging ...
Ah,
Um, Although I have not caught up with this thread.
Ralf-san and the member of OSSP are maintaining OSSP continuously.
I think that a reaction can merely be obtained in the intervals of when
busy. Please do not need fast response.
(2011/07/13 11:35), David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Jul 12, 2011,
On Jul 13, 2011, at 6:44 AM, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Um, Although I have not caught up with this thread.
Ralf-san and the member of OSSP are maintaining OSSP continuously.
I think that a reaction can merely be obtained in the intervals of when busy.
Please do not need fast response.
I have
On 07/03/2011 11:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2011-07-03 at 13:42 -0500, Michael Gould wrote:
I would like to request that full support for the UUID data type can added.
I think that even though there is a contrib module, since this is a standard
datatype that Postgres ought to be the
On 07/12/2011 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 07/03/2011 11:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2011-07-03 at 13:42 -0500, Michael Gould wrote:
I would like to request that full support for the UUID data type can
added.
I think that even though there is a contrib module, since this is
Magnus, JD,
UUID *is* in core. It's just the generation functions that aren't.
No, it's not. It's in /contrib, which makes it an extension.
Uh UUID/GUID is used pervasively throughout enterprise apps,
especially Java apps.
Oh, I guess I encounter it a lot less than you. Time for a
On 12 July 2011 19:24, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Magnus, JD,
UUID *is* in core. It's just the generation functions that aren't.
No, it's not. It's in /contrib, which makes it an extension.
The functions to produce UUIDs are in contrib, but the UUID data type
itself is in core.
On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:24 PM, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Magnus, JD,
UUID *is* in core. It's just the generation functions that aren't.
No, it's not. It's in /contrib, which makes it an extension.
Uh UUID/GUID is used pervasively throughout enterprise apps,
especially Java
Thom,
The functions to produce UUIDs are in contrib, but the UUID data type
itself is in core. You get the type uuid whether you install the
contrib module or not.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-uuid.html
Oh!
I guess that shows you how much I use the type then.
On 07/12/2011 11:56 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
Thom,
The functions to produce UUIDs are in contrib, but the UUID data type
itself is in core. You get the type uuid whether you install the
contrib module or not.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/datatype-uuid.html
Oh!
I guess that
On 07/12/2011 09:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 07/12/2011 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 07/03/2011 11:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On sön, 2011-07-03 at 13:42 -0500, Michael Gould wrote:
I would like to request that full support for the UUID data type can
added.
I think that even
On 07/12/2011 03:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
What about extensions makes them less usable?
It is an extra step, that is less usable. Does it matter? Shrug, I
know I hate having to type apt-get just to use xyz, does it mean it is
a big deal? Probably not.
By that argument we wouldn't
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:29:33PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 07/12/2011 03:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
What about extensions makes them less usable?
It is an extra step, that is less usable. Does it matter? Shrug, I
know I hate having to type apt-get just to use xyz, does it
On 07/12/2011 01:29 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 07/12/2011 03:44 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
What about extensions makes them less usable?
It is an extra step, that is less usable. Does it matter? Shrug, I
know I hate having to type apt-get just to use xyz, does it mean it is
a big deal?
On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:40 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
That is why I think having the UUID generators be a contrib module
is the correct place for them to be, but the UUID type is better as
a core function.
I'm okay with this, though given the fact that ftp.ossp.org has been down for
*months*,
David,
I'm okay with this, though given the fact that ftp.ossp.org has been down for
*months*, I'm inclined to think that we ought to include it in the contrib
distribution for easy linking.
What license is it under?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent
David E. Wheeler da...@kineticode.com writes:
On Jul 12, 2011, at 1:40 PM, k...@rice.edu wrote:
That is why I think having the UUID generators be a contrib module
is the correct place for them to be, but the UUID type is better as
a core function.
I'm okay with this, though given the fact
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Curious considering that the machine is there (responds to ping), and
the ossp.org webserver works fine. Has anyone bugged the owner about
that?
I've sent him email and Twitter DMs, to no avail.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Jul 12, 2011, at 5:06 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
I'm okay with this, though given the fact that ftp.ossp.org has been down
for *months*, I'm inclined to think that we ought to include it in the
contrib distribution for easy linking.
What license is it under?
COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:59, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:59, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Also, I think that UUIDs fall into the class of datatypes used by less
than 10% of users which should always remain extensions. I'd consider
CITEXT for core before UUID.
UUID *is*
On mån, 2011-07-11 at 11:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net writes:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 20:59, Josh Berkus j...@agliodbs.com wrote:
Also, I think that UUIDs fall into the class of datatypes used by less
than 10% of users which should always remain extensions.
Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of lun jul 11 11:48:22 -0400 2011:
That said, there have been several proposals over the years to move a
few things out of the core into add-ons, and now that extension support
exists, we could potentially reopen that discussion.
Surely we ought to
On 07/10/2011 11:59 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
fashion
I'd have to agree on the importance of UUID support. It's pretty much
essential for any sort of disconnected sync model. We use UUIDs
(generated with the guid.comb technique) for our surrogate keys in
around 50 apps, and it has served us well.
We have also been seriously missing the 64-bit
On 7/3/11 2:02 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
fashion or another :-(). Between that and the lack
On sön, 2011-07-03 at 17:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah. If there were One True Way to create a UUID, I would probably
agree that we should push that functionality into core. But there are
a lot of ways (and the reason for that is that they all suck in one
fashion or another :-(). Between
Should be in 9.0.5/9.1b3
On Sunday, July 3, 2011, Michael Gould
mgo...@intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net wrote:
gt; Does this look to be something that will surface around for 9.1
gt;
gt; Sent from Samsung mobile
gt;
gt; Dave Page lt;dp...@pgadmin.orggt; wrote:
gt;
gt;gt;On Sunday, July 3, 2011,
Dave,
This is wonderful news.
Best Regards
Michael Gould
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
Should be in 9.0.5/9.1b3
On Sunday, July 3, 2011, Michael Gould
mgo...@intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net wrote:
Does this look to be something that will surface around for 9.1
Sent from
On sön, 2011-07-03 at 13:42 -0500, Michael Gould wrote:
I would like to request that full support for the UUID data type can added.
I think that even though there is a contrib module, since this is a standard
datatype that Postgres ought to be the one actually assigning the value.
What
Peter,
I don't believe that the library that the contrib module runs with can run
on Window 64 bit servers or even Windows 7 64 bit. That is problem as most
shops are using 64 bit OS and if Window the contrib module is going to fail.
Taking the responsibility to handle this internally means
On Sunday, July 3, 2011, Michael Gould
mgo...@intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net wrote:
gt; Peter,
gt;
gt; I don't believe that the library that the contrib module runs with can run
gt; on Window 64 bit servers or even Windows 7 64 bit. That is problem as most
gt; shops are using 64 bit OS and if
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org writes:
Even If that weren't the case, integrating the type wouldn't fix the
problem anyway, unless you're suggesting we implement our own UUID
generator (which isn't nearly as straightforward as it might seem, as
I understand it)..
Yeah. If there were One True
Does this look to be something that will surface around for 9.1
Sent from Samsung mobile
Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org wrote:
On Sunday, July 3, 2011, Michael Gould
mgo...@intermodalsoftwaresolutions.net wrote:
gt; Peter,
gt;
gt; I don't believe that the library that the contrib module runs with
36 matches
Mail list logo
