On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 12:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The CF app was and is specifically for dealing with CFs. Having it
deal with backpatches makes it, well, a bugtracker. It's not meant to
be that. If we want a
I'd imagine having a CF entry per release, so after a set of minor
releases, the CF is closed.
How would we name these?
Also, what about patches for beta? Should we have a beta CF?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Josh Berkus wrote:
I'd imagine having a CF entry per release, so after a set of minor
releases, the CF is closed.
How would we name these?
Also, what about patches for beta? Should we have a beta CF?
Don't
Josh Berkus wrote:
I'd imagine having a CF entry per release, so after a set of minor
releases, the CF is closed.
How would we name these?
Also, what about patches for beta? Should we have a beta CF?
Don't we have the Open Items wiki page for those? Seems to work well
enough.
--
Le mardi 18 juin 2013 04:48:02, Peter Eisentraut a écrit :
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:11 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Contributors,
While going through this mailing list looking for missing 9.4 patches, I
realized that we don't track backpatches (that is, fixes to prior
versions) at all
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:11 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Contributors,
While going through this mailing list looking for missing 9.4 patches, I
realized that we don't track backpatches (that is, fixes to prior
versions) at
On 2013-06-18 12:32:42 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:11 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Contributors,
While going through this mailing list looking for missing 9.4 patches, I
realized that we
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 12:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The CF app was and is specifically for dealing with CFs. Having it
deal with backpatches makes it, well, a bugtracker. It's not meant to
be that. If we want a bugtracker, then it has very different
requirements.
It's not in evidence
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:44:53PM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On Tue, 2013-06-18 at 12:32 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
The CF app was and is specifically for dealing with CFs. Having it
deal with backpatches makes it, well, a bugtracker. It's not meant to
be that. If we want a
On Mon, 2013-06-17 at 17:11 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Contributors,
While going through this mailing list looking for missing 9.4 patches, I
realized that we don't track backpatches (that is, fixes to prior
versions) at all anywhere. Where backpatches are submitted by
committers this isn't
10 matches
Mail list logo
