On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 14:32 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2012-05-02 at 13:40 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
How hard would it be to add support for LIKE syntax, similar to table
def in field list declaration for
Hello
(1 row)
This works the same indeed, just seems to be a hack, though a cool
one :)
hannu=# insert into test
hannu-# SELECT * FROM populate_record(null::test,
'id=456, data=zzz');
INSERT 0 1
few years back I proposed anytypename type
with this feature,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
(1 row)
This works the same indeed, just seems to be a hack, though a cool
one :)
Yeah -- the syntax isn't great, but IMO it's more generally usable
than what you're proposing because it's a scalar returning
2012/5/3 Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
(1 row)
This works the same indeed, just seems to be a hack, though a cool
one :)
Yeah -- the syntax isn't great, but IMO it's more generally usable
than what
On 05/03/2012 09:43 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2012/5/3 Merlin Moncuremmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
(1 row)
This works the same indeed, just seems to be a hack, though a cool
one :)
Yeah -- the syntax isn't great, but
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/03/2012 09:43 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2012/5/3 Merlin Moncuremmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello
(1 row)
This works the same indeed, just
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
You guys seem to be taking the original proposal off into the weeds. I
have often wanted to be able to use LIKE in type expressions, and I'd
like to see exactly that implemented.
This notion of anytypename is utterly unworkable anyway; there's no
2012/5/3 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
You guys seem to be taking the original proposal off into the weeds. I
have often wanted to be able to use LIKE in type expressions, and I'd
like to see exactly that implemented.
This notion of anytypename is
On 05/03/2012 10:18 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 05/03/2012 09:43 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
2012/5/3 Merlin Moncuremmonc...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Pavel Stehulepavel.steh...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/5/3 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
This notion of anytypename is utterly unworkable anyway; there's no
way for the parser to know soon enough that a given argument position
needs to be read as a type name rather than a normal expression.
type
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Why would you always need FROM?
that was coming from Hannu's original example:
insert into test2
select * from json_to_record(jrec json) as (like test2);
how do you work it so you can call:
select json_to_record(jrec
2012/5/3 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/5/3 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
This notion of anytypename is utterly unworkable anyway; there's no
way for the parser to know soon enough that a given argument position
needs to be read as a type name
Pavel Stehule pavel.steh...@gmail.com writes:
2012/5/3 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
No, it isn't, at least not if you have any ambition to support array
types for instance; to say nothing of types whose standard names are
keywords, multiple words, etc.
we can identify a position anytypename
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Maybe some keyword can help to us. What do you think about new
operator TYPE that can returns regtype value and can be used together
with polymorphic functions.
Doesn't have any more attraction for me than the proposed LIKE
On ons, 2012-05-02 at 13:40 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
How hard would it be to add support for LIKE syntax, similar to table
def in field list declaration for generic record functions
What I'dd like to be able to do is to have a generic json_to_record
function
CREATE OR REPLACE RECORD
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net wrote:
On ons, 2012-05-02 at 13:40 +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
How hard would it be to add support for LIKE syntax, similar to table
def in field list declaration for generic record functions
What I'dd like to be able to do is
16 matches
Mail list logo
