"Guillaume Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 9/13/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> statement: querystring Simple Query
>> parse : querystring Parse
>> bind /: querystring Bind
>> execute /: querystringExecute
> I agree with that.
OK, Bruce h
On 9/13/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
statement: querystring Simple Query
parse : querystring Parse
bind /: querystring Bind
execute /: querystringExecute
I agree with that.
Hmmm, AFAICS, you changed "/" to " to
"Guillaume Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMHO, it's more logical to remove it as the text after statement: is
> not a statement in the extended query protocol case.
Well, I was never particularly enamored of the idea that we should put
statement: into everything generated by log_statement.
On 9/13/06, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Guillaume Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I attached a patch to improve the consistency. It adds statement: for
> every case.
Isn't that just bloating the log? And weren't you the one complaining
about log volumes to begin with?
As I told y
"Guillaume Smet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I attached a patch to improve the consistency. It adds statement: for
> every case.
Isn't that just bloating the log? And weren't you the one complaining
about log volumes to begin with?
The reason it is why it is is that Bruce wanted the wording to
