Hi Brar,
Thanks for sharing your work compiling Postgres with VS2010. I see that
there's a patch file you created to fix the files that need fixing to do so,
but I don't know how to apply this patch. What's the exe that runs this
patch? Will it ask me where the source folder root is when I run
thready wrote:
[...]
I don't know how to apply this patch. What's the exe that runs this
patch? Will it ask me where the source folder root is when I run it?
As the archives seem to be unreachable at the moment I'm copying text
from the following message which I would otherwise ask you to
schrieb Craig Ringer:
I'd appreciate it if you'd post the config.pl you're building with,
mainly so I can see what libraries and optional features you are or
are not using with your test builds.
I've already posted it here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4dcda3cd.4030...@gmx.de
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
Perhaps someone who routinely does 64-bit builds could help out with a
config.pl and some info from where to get the 64-bit libraries to build
with.
Here's what we use for the installers.
# Configuration arguments for vcbuild.
On Fri, 13 May 2011 23:34:05 +0200, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
I'd appreciate any reviews, tests or comments.
As the current commitfest is getting more and more active recently i've
rechecked my patch and updated it for code drift.
No real changes.
See
Brar Piening b...@gmx.de writes:
On Fri, 13 May 2011 23:34:05 +0200, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
[...]
I'd appreciate any reviews, tests or comments.
As the current commitfest is getting more and more active recently i've
rechecked my patch and updated it for code drift.
No real
On Sun, 06 Feb 2011 23:06:21 +0100, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:26:22 +0100, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net wrote:
it's not something we should hold up the CF / release for.
I agree.
At least it should get some more testing besides mine.
[...]
Being somewhat
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
After some months of being able to regularly compile current head using
Visual Studio 2010 compilers and some more tests I no longer see any reason
why this patch would change without external feedback.
You probably want to add
On Fri, 13 May 2011 21:52:47 -0400, Robert Haas
robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
You probably want to add it here, then:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open
I's been in the last commitfest and i've recently moved it to the
current one already.
See
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 23:06, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:26:22 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
it's not something we should hold up the CF / release for.
I agree.
At least it should get some more testing besides mine.
I've set up virtual
On Sun, 30 Jan 2011 21:26:22 +0100, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net wrote:
it's not something we should hold up the CF / release for.
I agree.
At least it should get some more testing besides mine.
I've set up virtual machines with VS 2003, VS 2005 Express, VS 2008
Express (+ my PC with
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Magnus, are you planning to get this committed for 9.1?
I'd like to, but I'm not sure I'll have the time. Per the comment from
Brar it was intended as an initial attempt not quite ready yet, so
it's not something we
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
I'll run
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 21:06, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
Hi,
I initially considered this patch as a primer to start off some basic
VS2010 support and not as something to be commited within the next few
commitfests.
As there seems to be at least some interest in this patch I refactored
the code and did some more testing (actually found some weird
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 00:06:10 +0100, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
So there is now a third version of this patch at
http://www.piening.info/VS2010v3.patch
Forgot to run perltidy on it - fixed in
http://www.piening.info/VS2010v4.patch
Sorry!
Brar
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
I'll run it once for that now, and then please rebase your
patch on top of that -
On 1/15/2011 1:42 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Pieningb...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagandermag...@hagander.net
wrote:
Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
I'll run it once for that now, and then
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 16:45, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
wrote:
Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
I'll run it once for that now, and then please rebase your
patch on top of that -
On 01/05/2011 12:33 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
It's actually the same patch as before with the corrupted line-endings
parsed out.
git diff master VS2010 ../VS2010.patch reproduceabyl generates those on
my (windows) system when I use git-external-diff configured as described in
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
I've abandoned the use of an external diff program for git. If I need
context diffs I produce them by piping normal git diff output through
filterdiff --format=context.
One possible disadvantage of that it strips out
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/src/backend/commands/alter.c b/src/backend/commands/alter.c
index 6a9b21d..1c6ae02 100644
I actually haven't figured out exactly under what circumstances that
I think it's for git am -3
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 08:19, Brar Piening b...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
i'v created a patch enables support for building PostgreSQL with Visual
Studio 2010 or Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 4
(Windows SDK 7.1).
You can grab it from http://www.piening.info/VS2010.patch
This
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100
Von: Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
An: Brar Piening b...@gmx.de
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Betreff: Re: [HACKERS] Visual Studio 2010/Windows SDK 7.1 support
This patch does not apply at all to my
On 01/03/2011 06:26 AM, Brar Piening wrote:
No that was probably all.
My patch - fixed as described above - should apply to your repository once
you've run perltidy.
I'll rebase the patch as soon as I return from work unless you tell me
otherwise.
Please, this time let's backpatch the
On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 10:44:19 +0100, Magnus Hagander
mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Yeah, it looks that way - it's missing the ordering of the contrib
I'll run it once for that now, and then please rebase your
patch on top of that - makes it easier to review it.
The rebased patch can be grabbed from
26 matches
Mail list logo
