On 09/24/2011 09:51 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On 09/13/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
The ability to restore a table from a backup file to a different
table
name in the same database and schema.
This can be done but agreed it is no
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
> >
> > The ability to restore a table from a backup file to a different
> > table
> > name in the same database and schema.
> >
> >
> > This can be done but agreed it is not intuitive.
> >
> >
>
On 2011-09-14 17:27, David E. Wheeler wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:49 AM, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
[brief]: http://postgresopen.org/2011/schedule/presentations/83/
You list Job scheduling as one item here,
but not here
Here's my preliminary list:
Could you expand your idea about this here?
I
DW, All:
- Update newsysviews and bundle it as an extension, and maintain it for
each new version
- Add median() and quartile() windowing aggregates, or similar equivalents.
- work on pgTune
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgs
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
>
> But I found it useful when needing to hand out "seperate" usernames
> for different apps because they all needed to have their own
> search_path and other settings set before login (yes, dumb apps,
> mostly odbc), and be able to have the s
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> last time i tried it (last year), it seems broken because i couldn't
> log in with any user anymore... but it could be that i did something
> wrong so i didn't report until i could confirm but i hadn't the time
> and i forgot it since then
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>
Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
multiple independent customers on a server without
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 07:14 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >
> >>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
> >>> multiple independent customers on a server with
On Sep 14, 2011, at 5:49 AM, Kaare Rasmussen wrote:
>> [brief]: http://postgresopen.org/2011/schedule/presentations/83/
> You list Job scheduling as one item here,
>
> but not here
>> Here's my preliminary list:
> Could you expand your idea about this here?
It was something suggested to me on IR
On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
multiple back ends each running on a separate port,
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 17:02 -0300, Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Rodrigo Gonzalez writes:
> >>> In a perfect world, it would be nice if one could do combined queries
> >>> linking a PostgreSQL database with an Oracle one, or a MySQL one,
> >> Can't you do th
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
> > multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
> > multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL
> > has had for a
Hi
[brief]: http://postgresopen.org/2011/schedule/presentations/83/
You list Job scheduling as one item here,
but not here
Here's my preliminary list:
Could you expand your idea about this here?
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your su
On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:50 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
>> Thanks to Greg Smith for adding a few bonus ideas I hadn't thought of. What
>> else have you got? I don't think we necessarily have to limit ourselves to
>> core features, BTW: projects like PostGIS and pgAdmin are also clearly
>> popular, an
On Sep 13, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> And here:
>
> http://www.pgxn.org/tag/foreign%20data%20wrapper/
A shorter URL with more results:
http://www.pgxn.org/tag/fdw
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subsc
From: pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-ow...@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Nolan
Sent: Tuesday, September 13, 2011 11:51 AM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What Would You Like To Do?
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:21 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> So, what do you want to work on? Let me know, I'll do as much match-making
> at the conference as I can.
>
Here is my list:
* Additional approximate string matching functions and index access for them
using gin/gist/spgist.
* Signature ind
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
>
>>The ability to restore a table from a backup file to a different
>>table
>>name in the same database and schema.
>>
>>
>>This can be done but agreed it is not
Rodrigo Gonzalez wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> FDW provides the structure within which that will eventually be
>> possible, but there's no Oracle or MySQL wrapper today ...
> They are both listed at wiki
And here:
http://www.pgxn.org/tag/foreign%20data%20wrapper/
-K
On 09/13/2011 04:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Rodrigo Gonzalez writes:
In a perfect world, it would be nice if one could do combined queries
linking a PostgreSQL database with an Oracle one, or a MySQL one,
Can't you do that with FDW that is present in 9.1?
FDW provides the structure within which t
On 09/13/2011 11:51 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
The ability to restore a table from a backup file to a different
table
name in the same database and schema.
This can be done but agreed it is not intuitive.
Can you elaborate on tha a bit, please? The only way I've
Rodrigo Gonzalez writes:
>> In a perfect world, it would be nice if one could do combined queries
>> linking a PostgreSQL database with an Oracle one, or a MySQL one,
> Can't you do that with FDW that is present in 9.1?
FDW provides the structure within which that will eventually be
possible,
On 09/13/2011 03:51 PM, Michael Nolan wrote:
For example:
A fully integrated ability to query across multiple
databases,possibly
on multiple servers, something Oracle has had for nearly two
decades.
That isn't the approach to take. The fact that Oracle has
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2011 10:13 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
>
>> The lists all seem to be focusing on the things that the developers
>> would like to add to PostgreSQL, what about some things that users or
>> ISPs might like to have, and thus perhaps s
On 09/13/2011 10:13 AM, Michael Nolan wrote:
The lists all seem to be focusing on the things that the developers
would like to add to PostgreSQL, what about some things that users or
ISPs might like to have, and thus perhaps something that companies might
actually see as worth funding?
Well ju
The lists all seem to be focusing on the things that the developers would
like to add to PostgreSQL, what about some things that users or ISPs might
like to have, and thus perhaps something that companies might actually see
as worth funding?
For example:
A fully integrated ability to query across
On 12 September 2011 05:21, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> Later this week I'm giving a [brief][] for an audience of what I hope will be
> corporate PostgreSQL users that covers how to get a feature developed for
> PostgreSQL. The idea here is that there are a lot of organizations out th
On Sep 13, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Hannu Krosing / 2ndQuadrant
>
> * more enhancements to pl/python - use real function arguments,
> store modules in database, direct support for postgresql types,
> operators and functions, automatic startup command,
> automatic ORM from
On Sun, 2011-09-11 at 21:21 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> Later this week I'm giving a [brief][] for an audience of what I
> hope will be corporate PostgreSQL users that covers how to get a
> feature developed for PostgreSQL. The idea here is that there are
> a lot of organizati
On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:41 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > I'm not looking for funding (probably couldn't take it if I was offered
> > it, heh), so I'm not sure if it should be included, but I'm still
> > planning to dig into revamping the logging system (if I can ever manage
> > to get out from unde
On Sep 13, 2011 2:37 AM, "Stephen Frost" wrote:
>
> * David E. Wheeler (da...@kineticode.com) wrote:
> > Toward the end of the presentation, I'd like to make some suggestions
and offer to do some match-making. I'm thinking primarily of listing some of
the stuff the community would love to see done
* David E. Wheeler (da...@kineticode.com) wrote:
> Toward the end of the presentation, I'd like to make some suggestions and
> offer to do some match-making. I'm thinking primarily of listing some of the
> stuff the community would love to see done, along with the names of the folks
> and/or com
On Sep 12, 2011, at 6:01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Column-level collation support already exists.
Yeah, just realized that. I mention to say table or column-level encoding.
Best,
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscripti
Hi,
"David E. Wheeler" writes:
> Thanks to Greg Smith for adding a few bonus ideas I hadn't thought of. What
> else have you got? I don't think we necessarily have to limit ourselves to
> core features, BTW: projects like PostGIS and pgAdmin are also clearly
> popular, and new projects of that sc
On sön, 2011-09-11 at 21:21 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> * Column-leve collation support: Peter/Enterprise DB
Column-level collation support already exists.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org
35 matches
Mail list logo
