Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Naz Gassiep wrote:
> >> Did this make it into the to-do list for 8.3 ?
>
> > Don't worry about the to-do list too much.
>
> In particular, if you're imagining that being in the TODO list will
> in itself cause anyone to work on it,
Hi, Tom,
Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAIR what was discussed was separating
> - schema stuff needed before loading data
> - table data
> - schema stuff needed after loading data
> where the last category boils down to "indexes and then foreign keys".
> All the "other stuff" such as funct
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Naz Gassiep wrote:
>> Did this make it into the to-do list for 8.3 ?
> Don't worry about the to-do list too much.
In particular, if you're imagining that being in the TODO list will
in itself cause anyone to work on it, you're much mistaken about this
Naz Gassiep wrote:
>
> >None, but feel free to start coding for 8.3.My coding skills are still
> >nascent, but I shall do my best.
> My coding skills are still pretty nascent, but I shall do my best.
> >
> >That seems like a rather spectacular overstatement of the likely
> >benefits, not to menti
None, but feel free to start coding for 8.3.My coding skills are still nascent,
but I shall do my best.
My coding skills are still pretty nascent, but I shall do my best.
That seems like a rather spectacular overstatement of the likely
benefits, not to mention a misdescription of what was di
That seems like a rather spectacular overstatement of the likely
benefits, not to mention a misdescription of what was discussed.
AFAIR what was discussed was separating
Yes, that is what was discussed.
- schema stuff needed before loading data
- table data
- schema
Naz Gassiep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At risk of being chastised for reviving old issues, I was wondering,
> what are the chances were of getting the dump / restore selectivity into
> 8.2 ?
None, but feel free to start coding for 8.3.
> I am referring to the idea that, instead of the curren
Zero, because feature freeze is over.
Aah yes, fair enough
If you find this feature interesting, you are free to drive the development
yourself, independent of it appearing on any list. To avoid tears later on,
look for a consensus about the merit of the feature first, though
This has be
Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 15:22 schrieb Naz Gassiep:
> At risk of being chastised for reviving old issues, I was wondering,
> what are the chances were of getting the dump / restore selectivity into
> 8.2 ?
Zero, because feature freeze is over.
> Did this item make it onto the to-do list? I