On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao writes:
>> When the number of sync standbys is set to 0 in s_s_names, the assersion
>> failure happens as follows. This means that current multiple syncrep code
>> assumes that the num of sync standbys must be greater than 0. But we f
Fujii Masao writes:
> When the number of sync standbys is set to 0 in s_s_names, the assersion
> failure happens as follows. This means that current multiple syncrep code
> assumes that the num of sync standbys must be greater than 0. But we forgot
> to forbid users from setting that num to 0. Thi
