Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-03 Thread Dave Page



 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
 
 
 Dave Page writes:
 
majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will build 
standalone on *nix systems please? There should be no
   dependencies on
any of the rest of the code - certainly there isn't for 
 the Win32 
build.
  
   I'm working something out.  I'll send it to you tomorrow.
 
 Hah.  I tried to put something together based on Automake and 
 Libtool, but I must conclude that Libtool is just completely 
 utterly broken.  I also considered copying over 
 Makefile.shlib, but that would draw in too many auxiliary 
 files and create a different kind of mess.  So what I would 
 suggest right now as the course of action is to copy your 
 local psqlodbc subtree to its old location under interfaces/ 
 and try to hook things together that way.
 
 Perhaps one of these days we should convert Makefile.shlib 
 into a shell script that we can deploy more easily to 
 different projects.

I have added README.unix to the psqlODBC CVS containing the following
text:

I assume the odbc options haven't been removed from the autoconf stuff?

Regards, Dave.

psqlODBC README for *nix Systems


Since psqlODBC has be moved from the main PostgreSQL source tree, we
have yet
to create a new build system for the driver. Currently, in order to
build under
*nix systems, it is recommended that you copy the files in this
directory to
src/interfaces/odbc in your PostgreSQL source tree, then re-run
configure with
the required options from the top of the tree. The driver can then be
built
using make as per normal.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-02 Thread Dave Page



 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 01 October 2002 21:05
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
 
 
 Dave Page writes:
 
majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will build 
standalone on *nix systems please? There should be no
   dependencies on
any of the rest of the code - certainly there isn't for 
 the Win32 
build.
  
   I'm working something out.  I'll send it to you tomorrow.
 
 Hah.  I tried to put something together based on Automake and 
 Libtool, but I must conclude that Libtool is just completely 
 utterly broken.  I also considered copying over 
 Makefile.shlib, but that would draw in too many auxiliary 
 files and create a different kind of mess.  So what I would 
 suggest right now as the course of action is to copy your 
 local psqlodbc subtree to its old location under interfaces/ 
 and try to hook things together that way.
 
 Perhaps one of these days we should convert Makefile.shlib 
 into a shell script that we can deploy more easily to 
 different projects.

Thanks for trying Peter.

Are we going to get the same problems for the other bits (libpq++?) that
we've ripped out? Is anyone looking at them, or have they just been
dumped on Gborg  forgotten?

Regards, Dave.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-01 Thread Dave Page



 -Original Message-
 From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: 30 September 2002 21:11
 To: Dave Page
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)
 
 
 Dave Page writes:
 
  Can someone who knows make better than I (which is probably 
 the vast 
  majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will build 
  standalone on *nix systems please? There should be no 
 dependencies on 
  any of the rest of the code - certainly there isn't for the Win32 
  build.
 
 I'm working something out.  I'll send it to you tomorrow.

Thanks Peter.

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly



Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-10-01 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Dave Page writes:

   majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will build
   standalone on *nix systems please? There should be no
  dependencies on
   any of the rest of the code - certainly there isn't for the Win32
   build.
 
  I'm working something out.  I'll send it to you tomorrow.

Hah.  I tried to put something together based on Automake and Libtool, but
I must conclude that Libtool is just completely utterly broken.  I also
considered copying over Makefile.shlib, but that would draw in too many
auxiliary files and create a different kind of mess.  So what I would
suggest right now as the course of action is to copy your local psqlodbc
subtree to its old location under interfaces/ and try to hook things
together that way.

Perhaps one of these days we should convert Makefile.shlib into a shell
script that we can deploy more easily to different projects.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [HACKERS] psqlODBC *nix Makefile (new 7.3 open item?)

2002-09-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut

Dave Page writes:

 Can someone who knows make better than I (which is probably the vast
 majority of you!) knock up a makefile so the driver will build
 standalone on *nix systems please? There should be no dependencies on
 any of the rest of the code - certainly there isn't for the Win32 build.

I'm working something out.  I'll send it to you tomorrow.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])