On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 02:20:53PM -0700, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index 6b202e0..0677059 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -5150,7 +5150,7 @@ set_config_option(const char *name, const char *value,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:35:59PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
index 6b202e0..0677059 100644
--- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
+++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c
@@ -5150,7
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com writes:
The check_temp_buffers()
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Example:
create temporary table foo (a int);
insert into foo values (1);
alter role peter set temp_buffers = 120;
ERROR: 22023: invalid value for parameter temp_buffers: 120
DETAIL:
Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com writes:
The check_temp_buffers() problem seems like a regression and blocks us
from upgrading to 9.2. The use case are functions that set
temp_buffers and occasionally are called in a series from a parent
session. The work around is... a lot of work.
Uh
Uh ... how is that a regression? AFAIK it's been that way right along.
No, it hasn't. I currently have an application whose functions, each of
which sets temp_buffers, works fine under 9.0 and ERRORs out under 9.2.
It's blocking an upgrade.
This is new.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com writes:
The check_temp_buffers() problem seems like a regression and blocks us
from upgrading to 9.2. The use case are functions that set
temp_buffers and occasionally are called in a series
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Selena Deckelmann sel...@chesnok.com writes:
The check_temp_buffers() problem seems like a regression and blocks us
from upgrading to 9.2. The use case
Peter Eisentraut pete...@gmx.net writes:
Example:
create temporary table foo (a int);
insert into foo values (1);
alter role peter set temp_buffers = 120;
ERROR: 22023: invalid value for parameter temp_buffers: 120
DETAIL: temp_buffers cannot be changed after any temporary tables
have
10 matches
Mail list logo
