Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
see it included.
Amen to that!
I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
arr
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
see it included.
Amen to that!
I
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Anyway I'm going to start on this patch next, so last chance for
opinions about the syntax ...
Oh, I was looking at this one:
On 02/15/2011 08:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Tom Lanet...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haasrobertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frostsfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/15/2011 08:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Anyhoo, forcing the explicit ARRAY keyword in there seems like pretty
cheap future-proofing to me. YMMV.
If this is the syntax that makes you do things like:
FOREACH foo IN ARRAY ARRAY[1,2,3]
I have
2011/2/16 Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us:
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
On 02/15/2011 08:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
Anyhoo, forcing the explicit ARRAY keyword in there seems like pretty
cheap future-proofing to me. YMMV.
If this is the syntax that makes you do things like:
Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net writes:
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
There is only bad keywords in doc - SCALE instead SLICE and a maybe a
usage of slicing need a example.
Err, yeah, a couple of stupid documentation issues, sorry about that.
Applied with assorted
Greetings,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I resend a patch with last update of this patch
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
see it included. To that end, I've done perhaps a bit more than a
review of the patch. Pavel, if you could go over
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:26 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Greetings,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I resend a patch with last update of this patch
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
see it included. To that end, I've done
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Amen to that!
Hopefully it helped. :)
I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr. That's probably a good
idea, because it gives us an escape hatch against needing to invent
yet
2011/2/8 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
Greetings,
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I resend a patch with last update of this patch
Alright, so, like I said, I really like this feature and would like to
see it included. To that end, I've done perhaps a bit more than a
2011/2/8 Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Amen to that!
Hopefully it helped. :)
I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr. That's probably a good
idea, because it gives us an
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.steh...@gmail.com) wrote:
There is only bad keywords in doc - SCALE instead SLICE and a maybe a
usage of slicing need a example.
Err, yeah, a couple of stupid documentation issues, sorry about that.
commit 9460c0831f5de71e31823b7e9d8511d2d8124776
Author: Stephen Frost
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
I think the syntax Tom suggested before was FOREACH thingy IN ARRAY
arr rather than just FOREACH thingy IN arr. That's probably a good
idea, because it gives us an escape hatch against needing to invent
yet another variant of this syntax - the word
14 matches
Mail list logo
