Re: [JDBC] JDBC build patches

2001-03-14 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Mount writes: > > > So far our standard has been to use 5432 if no port is supplied. > > > >It's still this way. As I said, only people that use configure > >--with-pgport see any change, and those people know what they're getting > >into. > > Perhaps a message saying this (or even in the

Re: [JDBC] JDBC build patches

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 17:47 12/03/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >Peter Mount writes: > > > What's the difference between uninstall and clean? > >'clean' undoes 'all', 'uninstall' undoes 'install'. Ah ok. > > >* honour the default port as specified to configure > > > > Hmm, not a good idea. The driver should b

Re: [JDBC] JDBC build patches

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Peter Mount writes: > What's the difference between uninstall and clean? 'clean' undoes 'all', 'uninstall' undoes 'install'. > >* honour the default port as specified to configure > > Hmm, not a good idea. The driver should be as globally useable (part of > write once run anywhere), so this wou

Re: [JDBC] JDBC build patches

2001-03-12 Thread Peter Mount
At 23:42 09/03/01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: >These are the follow-up patches to Peter Mount's recent Java build >improvements. > >* implement 'make uninstall' for the java directories What's the difference between uninstall and clean? >* pick up the version information from Makefile.global

[JDBC] JDBC build patches

2001-03-09 Thread Peter Eisentraut
These are the follow-up patches to Peter Mount's recent Java build improvements. * implement 'make uninstall' for the java directories * pick up the version information from Makefile.global * honour the default port as specified to configure * allow building outside the source tree (This doesn