Dave,
I share your concerns about this functionality. In fact last month I
wrote the following in response to a patch to this functionality.
I wouldn't mind this being pulled out of the main code line for now and
moved to contrib until it becomes more robust.
>>Robert,
>>
>>
>>Thanks for
| "Dave Cramer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| There are much better products out there with much better functionality
|
| See http://www.ambysoft.com/persistenceLayer.html
|
| I personally use Artom Rudoy's persistence layer
|
| www.sourceforge.net/projects/player
Turbine at jakarta.apache.or
c);
exc.printStackTrace();
}finally{
try {
if (conn != null) conn.close();
} catch (Exception ex){
;
}
}
}
}
-Original Message-----
From: Tony Grant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 5, 2001 9:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: jdbc list
Su
On Fri, 2001-10-05 at 14:57, Dave Cramer wrote:
> While fixing the handling of "unknown" data type in the result set I was
> faced with wading through the Serialize code.
>
> I am wondering if this is really a required/desireable feature?
>
> How many people out there are actually using it?
>
>
