Re: [JDBC] CVS compile problem

2001-08-25 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:43:59 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: >I am seeing the following error from Array.java. Any idea? I've briefly looked at it and all these errors are caused by org/postgresql/jdbc2/Array.java calling methods in org/postgresql/Field.java which are not there. This is related to the

Re: [JDBC] CVS compile problem

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:43:59 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: > >I am seeing the following error from Array.java. Any idea? > > I've briefly looked at it and all these errors are caused by > org/postgresql/jdbc2/Array.java calling methods in > org/postgresql/Field.java which are not there. > > This is

[JDBC] Re: [BUGS] Bug #424: JDBC driver security issue.

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
We have removed ConnectionHook.java from the 7.2 release. It was considered an ill-advised feature. > David Daney ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) reports a bug with a severity of 3 > The lower the number the more severe it is. > > Short Description > JDBC driver security issue. > > Long Description > Th

[JDBC] Re: [BUGS] Bug #428: Another security issue with the JDBC driver.

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. > I am sorry to keep going back and forth on this, but: > > The original patch is correct and does the proper thing. I should have > tested this before sounding the alarm. > > AccessController.doPrivileged() > > Propagates SecurityExceptions without wrapping them in

Re: [JDBC] Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-25 Thread Bruce Momjian
> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | This issue came up recently in relation to backpatching a python fix, > | and the conclusion was that jdbc 7.1.X is "a hopeless cause" and I tend > | to agree. I had >6 unapplied jdbc patches at the time we released 7.1. > | They are all now in