Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-27 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >500k of binaries? You just lost the argument. That's not an acceptable >amount of overhead to add to the Postgres distribution. Why? 500K can easily fit on a floppy, and that's technology from the 1980's. Regards, René Pijlman <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [JDBC] Error: ClassNotFoundException

2001-10-27 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:34:37 -0600, you wrote: >I have successfully installed >PostgreSQL on my Mac G4 running Mac OS X 10.1. I have no experience with this platform, but... >"Class.forName("org.postgresql.Driver");" returns the error >"java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.postgresql.Driver

Re: [JDBC] alternative driver jxDBCon

2001-10-27 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:58:55 +0200, you wrote: >has anyone made some experience using the jdbc driver jxDBCon for PostgreSQL? >it is an alternative to the driver released by PostgreSQL. >(http://jxdbcon.sourceforge.net) Its been mentioned a couple of times on this list, but I haven't seen any r

[JDBC] DatabaseMetaData.getTables()

2001-10-27 Thread Jason Davies
Hi, There seems to be a problem with DatabaseMetaData.getTables() when I do the following: ResultSet R=conn.getMetaData().getTables(null, null, "%", null); It throws a NullPointerException: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.postgresql.jdbc2.DatabaseMetaData.getTables(DatabaseMetaDa

Re: [JDBC] PostgreSQL, JDBC, and Druid

2001-10-27 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001 10:30:25 -0700, you wrote: >I use Druid to design my PG database. >I never got the jdbc driver to work. >Any idea of what's going on? It seems that the PostgreSQL JDBC driver doesn't work with various applications (Druid, StarOffice, DbVisualizer,...) because it does not yet p

Re: [JDBC] JDBC executeUpdate() does not return the number of rows effected

2001-10-27 Thread Robert Dyas
Barry, I was using Postgresql V7.1.3 and driver version 7.1-1.2. However, last night I downloaded 7.1-1.2 again and noticed that it was a few K larger, even though it had the exact same version number. When I tested with the "new" 7.1-1.2 (93,011 bytes vs approx 88K), executeUpdate() *did* retur

Re: [JDBC] Ant installation (and other) issues!

2001-10-27 Thread Barry Lind
Because many developers of postgres work over dialup modems at speeds of 32k. 500KB over a 32Kb line is a problem. Especially if you aren't even planning on using jdbc, you still pay the price when doing a CVS checkout. --Barry Rene Pijlman wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:22:19 -0400, Tom

Re: [JDBC] j2ee compatiable jdbc driver on jdbc.postgresql.org?

2001-10-27 Thread Gunnar Rønning
* Ned Wolpert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Humm... are you saying that the class PostgresqlDataSource doesn't work? I | guess I'm not sure what doesn't work with the driver. (Course, I've been using | PoolMan as the datasource to wrap the postgresql default connection rather than | using the da