: Barry Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 6:49 PM
To: andy
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JDBC] JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL
Andy,
Thanks for the code. In looking at this there are two things
that come
to mind:
1) You probably should
To all those who responded ,
Thanks for your response,
I have attached the test programs that I used in the form of text files. The
contents should be self evident. Please have a look and comment.
I used j2sdk1.3.1 down load to linux machine from sun.com as my java platform
and
And perl,
Hi,
I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table using and
found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
similar PERL routine the following results :
PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
In a similar experiment where PERL and JAVA did treir output to the
I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table
using and
found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
similar PERL routine the following results :
PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
In a similar experiment where PERL and JAVA did treir output to the
On Mon, 03 Sep 2001 07:47:29 +0200, you wrote:
I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table using and
found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
similar PERL routine the following results :
PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
In a similar experiment
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, andy wrote:
Hi,
I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL table using and
found that for the same number of records added to the table as a
similar PERL routine the following results :
PERL 39 seconds : JAVA 45 Seconds.
How did you start the tests?
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of andy
Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 12:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JDBC] JAVA vs PERL : PERL wins to postgreSQL
Hi,
I ran a few bench marks on JAVA writing to a postgreSQL
table using and
found that for the same number of records
