I agree, this is an excellent idea. A repository of JDBC driver JARs for
each different Postgres release - good thinking.
Is there somewhere on the Postgres site we can store these / get them
mirrored?
-mike
Mike Cannon-Brookes - Founder, Core Developer
OpenSymphony - http://www.opensymphony.co
Quoting Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Marko Kreen writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> > > At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes
> wrote:
> > > > > 3) currently we seem to
Marko Kreen writes:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> > At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> > >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > > > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > > > (fo
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 09:50:04AM +0100, Peter Mount wrote:
> At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > > (for 4 substitutions). It seems un
At 13:04 27/03/01 +0200, Marko Kreen wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> > Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)
>
>* NSHO about ant deleted *
>
> > 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> > (for 4
At 10:47 26/03/01 +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
>IMHO make should not be needed at all?
>
>I've hard coded the numbers into the Ant script now and it works fine. Java
>users like myself have brains that go "ooh, build.xml, let me run ant" to
>compile things.
>
>Why do we need make? (I'm sure t
At 18:56 27/03/01 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Mike Cannon-Brookes writes:
>
> > 1) ant files are quickly becoming a standard for compiling almost all open
> > source java projects
>
>The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
>At PostgreSQL, we use the GNU-style b
Mike Cannon-Brookes writes:
> 1) ant files are quickly becoming a standard for compiling almost all open
> source java projects
The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from.
At PostgreSQL, we use the GNU-style build system, which is already the
"standard" for compiling
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 07:54:15AM +1000, Mike Cannon-Brookes wrote:
> Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)
* NSHO about ant deleted *
> 3) currently we seem to have a build process that is 99% Ant and 1% make
> (for 4 substitutions). It seems unnecessarily complex to add
Well Peter, I must say many would disagree with you there ;)
I don't want to get into an ant vs make argument, but my main points are:
1) ant files are quickly becoming a standard for compiling almost all open
source java projects
2) ant files are BUILT for java projects
3) currently we seem to
Mike Cannon-Brookes writes:
> Why do we need make?
For consistency and to have a more powerful language.
--
Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet,
IMHO make should not be needed at all?
I've hard coded the numbers into the Ant script now and it works fine. Java
users like myself have brains that go "ooh, build.xml, let me run ant" to
compile things.
Why do we need make? (I'm sure there's a reason I can't see)
-mike
> -Original Messag
12 matches
Mail list logo
