Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-29 Thread Liam Stewart
On Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 06:42:56PM -0700, Barry Lind wrote: So going forward, whose responsibility is it to maintain this file? Is it the responsibility of the person submitting the patch (i.e. each patch should contain an update to CHANGELOG), or is it the responsibility of the person

[JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-24 Thread Barry Lind
So going forward, whose responsibility is it to maintain this file? Is it the responsibility of the person submitting the patch (i.e. each patch should contain an update to CHANGELOG), or is it the responsibility of the person applying the patch? thanks, --Barry Bruce Momjian wrote: Bruce,

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Quoting Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The other reason for telling people who are experiencing problems with the driver to get the latest version is that their bug has probably already been fixed. However a certain degree of caution should probably be exercised here.

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-23 Thread Peter T Mount
Quoting Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED]: The other reason for telling people who are experiencing problems with the driver to get the latest version is that their bug has probably already been fixed. However a certain degree of caution should probably be exercised here. The

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Bruce, I can try to fill in whatever I can. Where is it? Can you fill in as much as you can? Uh, there is a CHANGELOG file in the top level jdbc directory. We usually don't list interface-specific changes in the release notes. Instead we update a CHANGELOG file in the directory for that

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-23 Thread Rene Pijlman
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:46:18 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Momjian wrote: Uh, CHANGELOG? :-) No, I haven't been doing that, figuring I would update it in the main release notes. However, I haven't started doing that yet, and in fact I don't think I know enough about jdbc to know how to describe the

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-22 Thread Barry Lind
I agree with Bruce. I think we are in good shape for 7.2. As long as there is an active developer community working on maintaining and upgrading the code base there shouldn't be problems. Once we get the jdbc.postgresql.org website updated then there can be an official place to post

RE: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-22 Thread Dave Cramer
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian Sent: August 22, 2001 2:18 PM To: Barry Lind Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Gunnar Ronning Subject: Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver I agree with Bruce. I think we are in good shape for 7.2. As long as there is an active developer community

Re: [JDBC] Re: Couple of patches for jdbc driver

2001-08-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
The other reason for telling people who are experiencing problems with the driver to get the latest version is that their bug has probably already been fixed. However a certain degree of caution should probably be exercised here. The real problem is that I don't remember all the things