[PATCHES] spanish pg_dump catalog

2003-10-27 Thread Alvaro Herrera
One string added and some typos corrected. Please install. -- Alvaro Herrera () "La experiencia nos dice que el hombre peló millones de veces las patatas, pero era forzoso admitir la posibilidad de que en un caso entre millones, las patatas pelarían al hombre" (Ijon Tichy) pg_dump-es.po.gz Des

Re: [PATCHES] "make check" improvement for cygwin

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Something like this? > make MAX_CONNECTIONS=10 check > Maybe in the case of cygwin, where it is almost bound to fail without such > restrictions, we could put out a warning if it isn't used. That works for me. Possibly you should pop this proposa

Re: [PATCHES] "make check" improvement for cygwin

2003-10-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
- Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "PG Patches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [PATCHES] "make check" improvement for cygwin > "Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Th

Re: [PATCHES] "make check" improvement for cygwin

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The attached patch limits parallelism for "make check" on cygwin to 10 - me= > aning that at least on my installation "make check" actually succeeds at la= > st. If we're going to do something like that, I'd rather see it exposed as a more general "at

[PATCHES] "make check" improvement for cygwin

2003-10-27 Thread Andrew Dunstan
The attached patch limits parallelism for "make check" on cygwin to 10 - meaning that at least on my installation "make check" actually succeeds at last.   cheers   andrew pg_regress.patch Description: Binary data ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-27 Thread Josh Wilmes
Seems like the BEST case would be to have a configure test verify that it works and define something if it does, but i don't know what such a test would look like. --Josh Bruce Momjian wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__)

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__) > > /* use intimate shared memory on SPARC Solaris */ > > memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU); > > #else > > I think this is going in the wrong direction. Why isn't the co

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] ISM shared memory on solaris

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ! #if defined(sun) && defined(__sparc__) > /* use intimate shared memory on SPARC Solaris */ > memAddress = shmat(shmid, 0, SHM_SHARE_MMU); > #else I think this is going in the wrong direction. Why isn't the code just #if defined(SHM_SHA

Re: [PATCHES] [BUGS] PostgreSQL Patch: Test-and-set routine for HP-UX (IA-64)

2003-10-27 Thread Tom Lane
"ViSolve Open Source Team" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There are actually two issues: > 1. There is currently no tas (test-and-set) routine for HP-UX IA-64 in the > s_lock.h header file. > 2. In HP-UX IA-64, the suffix of shared libraries is ".so", but PostgreSQL > generates a ".sl" suffix. >