Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, I have reviewed the patch. I think Tom is doing the same, but I
> want to report the things I found.
I just came up for air after about two solid days of working on this
patch ... had not seen your message before committing it. The good
news is tha
I wrote the pg_dump bits, so I guess I can answer these...
And about restore, particularly to another machine, what do we do if the
tablespace can't be created in the location specified in the dump? The
tablespace creation fails, and all objects specified in that tablespace
also fail? Seems bad,
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Gavin Sherry wrote:
> > Attached is an updated patch, fixing a compile error which my compiler
> > didn't seem to detect/suffer from and incorporating fixes to problems
> > raised by Neil.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gavin
>
> OK, I have reviewed the patch. I think Tom is doi
> The problem I see with moving towards supporting savepoints with the
> current proposal is with how commit works:
>
> Consider:
>
> begin;
> insert into foo values (1);
> savepoint dammit;
> insert into foo values (2);
> select foo;
> insert into foo values (3);
>
On Thu, 2004-06-17 at 02:44, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I don't know what Oracle or other DBMSs expect in this area. Anyone
> care to give me a few pointers? If I'm missing something, I want to
> know as soon as possible.
Without ignoring your other responses, I remain massively impressed
SAVE
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
With this in place, implementing SAVEPOINTs the way SQL expects them to
work appears to be a very trivial exercise.
You may not see it, but a savepoint is just the start of a nested
transaction in disguise. Consider:
begin;
insert into foo values (1);
savepoi
Gavin Sherry wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch, fixing a compile error which my compiler
> didn't seem to detect/suffer from and incorporating fixes to problems
> raised by Neil.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gavin
OK, I have reviewed the patch. I think Tom is doing the same, but I
want to report the thi
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:41:14AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
> > five minutes using links at the bottom of the developer's page,
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php.
>
> Huh, the index
On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 08:41:14AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
> five minutes using links at the bottom of the developer's page,
> http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php.
Huh, the index came out empty! And it's not calle
Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
five minutes using links at the bottom of the developer's page,
http://developer.postgresql.org/index.php.
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> The attached patch
> -Original Message-
> From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 17 June 2004 02:00
> To: Dave Page; Claudio Natoli; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [PATCHES] pg_ctl service integration for WIN32
>
>
> Dave Page writes:
> > Looks OK to me at a quick glance. One thought t
11 matches
Mail list logo
