This adds mention of my latest tweak to the tsearch2/pg_trgm
integration. It is much better to create a word list of unstemmed words
than stemmed ones.
Chris
Index: contrib/pg_trgm/README.pg_trgm
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgs
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:13:01 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
> "ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.
There was a naming change between SQL-92 and SQL:1999, according to the
mentioned book.
The ":" is
Troels Arvin wrote:
> We have tried to use the official[1] short names:
> SQL-92
> SQL:1999
> SQL:2003
I could buy "SQL:1999", because then "SQL" would be a macro expanding to
"ISO/IEC 9075". But I don't see how SQL-92 fits in there.
> Note 1:
> http://books.elsevier.com/mk/default.asp?isbn=155
On Thu, 25 Nov 2004 19:16:47 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Btw., does anyone mind if I change the names of the standards to
>
> SQL 1992
> SQL 1999
> SQL 2003
>
> ? The other styles seem to be rather contrived and are not applied
> consistently.
We have tried to use the official[1] short na
Troels Arvin wrote:
> Simon Riggs, Elein Mustain, and I have worked on adjustments to the
> information schema and parts of the documentation to reflect upcoming
> changes in PostgreSQL 8 and changes from SQL:1999 to SQL:2003.
Thanks. I will evaluate this patch.
Btw., does anyone mind if I chang
Hi,
it looks users still use pg_dumplo from contrib tree:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 17:45 +0100, Düster Horst wrote:
> Hallo Karel
>
> I tried to use your pg_dumplo but it seems, that the version
> contributed with pg-7.4.5 does not support schemas.
here is a patch with:
* support absolute paths
Hello,
Simon Riggs, Elein Mustain, and I have worked on adjustments to the
information schema and parts of the documentation to reflect upcoming
changes in PostgreSQL 8 and changes from SQL:1999 to SQL:2003.
Attached is the result of that: A "diff -c" patch for current CVS HEAD.
The patch is also
