On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
IIRC, Rod Taylor did some work on supporting locks for non-table objects
back around the beginning of the year. We rejected the patch for various
reasons but you might be able to adopt some of it.
At the beggining of the past year,
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 14:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 12:46:46PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
IIRC, Rod Taylor did some work on supporting locks for non-table objects
back around the beginning of the year. We rejected the patch for various
reasons but you might be
Rod Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 14:48 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Does anyone remember why the patch was backed out? A pointer to the
archives would be most helpful.
In order to prevent the ability for a domain, schema, etc. to be dropped
while another process
--- Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
= select to_ascii('Jiménez');
will retrieve 'Jimenez' at least it works on
Latin1 encoding.
Why it not work on Latin9,
Probably because it hasn't got a
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why it not work on Latin9,
Probably because it hasn't got a table for Latin9.
Feel free to contribute one --- see
src/backend/utils/adt/ascii.c.
This page shows the differences between Latin1
Latin9:
http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/latin9.html
Jaime Casanova wrote:
188: it's an O merge with an E (sql_ascii = '')???
189: the same but lower case(sql_ascii = '')???
'OE' and 'oe', most likely, but someone more familiar with French
typography might correct me.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
--- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
188: it's an O merge with an E (sql_ascii =
'')???
189: the same but lower case(sql_ascii =
'')???
'OE' and 'oe', most likely, but someone more
familiar with French
typography might correct me.
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Jaime Casanova wrote:
188: it's an O merge with an E (sql_ascii = '')???
189: the same but lower case(sql_ascii = '')???
'OE' and 'oe', most likely, but someone more familiar with French
typography might correct me.
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Robert Treat wrote:
Changes the doc's to reflect what the user will find as default.
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
[ Attachment,
--- Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Jaime Casanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why it not work on Latin9,
Probably because it hasn't got a table for
Latin9.
Feel free to contribute one --- see
src/backend/utils/adt/ascii.c.
This page shows the differences between Latin1
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:09:17PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
'OE' and 'oe', most likely, but someone more familiar with French
typography might correct me.
OE and oe would be correct, but we can't do that with the current code.
More to the
11 matches
Mail list logo