This patch makes \d on tables and views sort fk constraints, triggers
and rules alphabetically in the output. This makes it the same as for
indexes and stops the irritating random or reverse ordering it currently
has.
Chris
Index: src/bin/psql/describe.c
===
David Fetter wrote:
Please find enclosed a patch that fixes the SGML so openjade doesn't
complain :)
Thanks, applied.
BTW, what version of openjade are you using? I'm using 1.4devel, and it
didn't complain about the markup mistakes.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)-
> Please find enclosed a patch that fixes the SGML so openjade doesn't
> complain :)
Oops.
Here's one without the extra dross.
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
Index: doc/src/sgml/charset.sgml
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Ron Mayer wrote:
>> My reasoning why I thought the log file was more useful was
>> that only an admin with access to the log files could really
>> do anything about the message anyway.
> The log file is useful, but I think showing the VACUUM user is _more_
> useful than th
Folks,
Please find enclosed a patch that fixes the SGML so openjade doesn't
complain :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
? GNUmakefile
? clean_sgml.diff
? config.log
? config.status
? upsert.diff
?
a_ogawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I remaked patch for "Cache last known per-tuple offsets to speed
> long tuple access" that is in TODO list.
I've applied this patch with some revisions (mostly to put the
functionality in places that seemed more appropriate than execQual.c).
Many thanks!
Ron Mayer wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > You didn't like server_min_messages = 'notify'?
>
> I merely don't have a feeling for how much additional stuff
> verbose would be putting in the log files.
You will probably see the creation of indexes and sequences, like this:
te
Neil Conway wrote:
Attached is a revised patch that also allows security definer and
function volatility to be changed.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
Marko Kreen wrote:
The patch itself is simply "cvs diff -r1.10 -r1.11 openssl.c",
so there should not be any recent typos in it. Now I also tested
it with both REL7_3_STABLE and REL7_2_STABLE and found no problems.
So I think its fine.
I've applied both this patch and the original patch (fix-opens
The attached patch implements the previously discussed header line
feature for CSV mode COPY. It is triggered by the keyword HEADER (blame
Bruce - he chose it ;-) ).
On input this feature causes the first line to be ignored; on output it
generates a line of column names. This will make playing w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't have a good solution, but I do think that you need to set things
> up so that an application or script must invoke the new behavior
> explicitly. Hidden defaults that silently change such behavior look
> like land mines wai
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 09:43:02PM +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Marko Kreen wrote:
> >Ah, ofcourse.
>
> The patch seems rather large to be applying to 7.3 and 7.2 -- but it's
> your contrib/ module, so I'll assume you're pretty confident this
> doesn't cause any regressions...
The patch itself i
Tom Lane wrote:
You realize of course that that can already be done with CREATE OR
REPLACE FUNCTION.
Good point; that makes me less wary of breaking dependencies on existing
functions via ALTER, since in any case that can already be done.
Incidentally, is there a reason that DROP FUNCTION doesn't
Marko Kreen wrote:
Ah, ofcourse.
The patch seems rather large to be applying to 7.3 and 7.2 -- but it's
your contrib/ module, so I'll assume you're pretty confident this
doesn't cause any regressions...
I'll apply the patch to 7.3 and 7.2 stable branches tomorrow.
-Neil
-
Neil Conway wrote:
This patch makes default_with_oids disabled by default, per earlier
discussion, and updates the documentation accordingly.
Applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 11:12:42AM +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
> Marko Kreen wrote:
> >Would you apply this one aswell? I see that the original
> >patch (openssl.c r1.11) applies to both branches without problems.
> >It is a bit larger than this one tho'.
>
> Should there have been a patch attached
16 matches
Mail list logo