Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch for operator families

Tom Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Attached is the current state of my work on generalizing operator classes into operator families, as per discussion last week. It's far from ready to apply, but I thought I'd circulate it for comments. What's done is ... Comments? Didn't we say

Re: [PATCHES] WIP patch for operator families

Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Didn't we say discussion should happen on -hackers so development progress would be more visible? 140K patches don't belong on -hackers ... regards, tom lane ---(end of

Re: [PATCHES] Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and

Is this something we want in 8.3? I am thinking visible/expired would be clearer terms. --- Glen Parker wrote: This patch consists of two c functions to expose n_live_tuples and n_dead_tuples, SQL functions to expose