Jeremy Drake wrote:
The patch has been sitting in the unapplied patches queue for a while
Barring any objections, I'll apply this tomorrow.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
Stefan Huehner wrote:
attached patch fixes some function declarations:
- () -> (void)
- k&r style -> ansi C
Applied, thanks for the patch.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
Stefan Huehner wrote:
attached patches marks several char* variables as const where they are
initialized with constant strings.
I really wonder how much value there is in using the "const" modifier
very widely. "const" for function parameters is valuable (because it
adds information about
This patch replaces the pthreads code in ecpg with native win32 threads,
in order to make it threadsafe. The idea is not to have to download the
non-standard pthreads library on windows.
Does it seem like it should be doing the right thing? Does somebody have
a good test-case where ecpg breaks whe
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
On 3/17/07, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In principle I am in favor of the patch.
Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
element used to process fragments than ?
Perhaps even something in a special namespace?
I did thi
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
What about it? W/o this not large patch XML functionality in 8.3 will
be weak...
Will it be accepted?
In principle I am in favor of the patch.
Would it be better to use some more unlikely name for the dummy root
element used to process fragments than ?
Perhap
What about it? W/o this not large patch XML functionality in 8.3 will be weak...
Will it be accepted?
On 3/5/07, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/4/07, Nikolay Samokhvalov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll fix these issues and extend the patch with resgression tests and
> docs
