On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:19 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
However, I think shortening the checkpoint interval is a perfectly valid
solution to that.
Agreed. That's what checkpoint_timeout is for. Greg can't choose to use
checkpoint_segments as the limit and then complain about unbounded
Simon Riggs wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 22:19 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
However, I think shortening the checkpoint interval is a perfectly valid
solution to that.
Agreed. That's what checkpoint_timeout is for. Greg can't choose to use
checkpoint_segments as the limit and then
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 16:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. Recovery will take longer, because the distance last committed redo
ptr will lag behind more.
True, you'd have to replay 1.5 checkpoint intervals on average instead
of 0.5 (more or less,
On Fri, 2007-06-22 at 16:57 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
If you're not, I think you should be. Keeping that replay interval
time down was one of the reasons why the people I was working with
were displeased with the implications of the very spread out style of
some LDC tunings. They were already
Hello,
I've just been bitten by this:
dsuch=# CREATE RULE foorule AS ON UPDATE
dsuch-# TO foo WHERE NEW.x = '1'
dsuch-# DO ALSO NOTIFY bar;
ERROR: rules with WHERE conditions may only have SELECT, INSERT,
UPDATE, or DELETE actions
Here's an explanation
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
I can't see why anyone would want to turn off smoothing: If they are
doing many writes, then they will be effected by the sharp dive at
checkpoint, which happens *every* checkpoint.
There are service-level agreement situations where a short and sharp
Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am not a fan of introducing a replacement feature based on what I
consider too limited testing, and I don't feel this one has been beat on
long yet enough to start pruning features that would allow better backward
compatibility/transitioning. I think
On Mon, 25 Jun 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm not sure why you hold such strong allegiance to the status quo. We
know that the status quo isn't working very well.
Don't get me wrong here; I am a big fan of this patch, think it's an
important step forward, and it's exactly the fact that I'm so
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, Simon Riggs wrote:
Greg can't choose to use checkpoint_segments as the limit and then
complain about unbounded recovery time, because that was clearly a
conscious choice.
I'm complaining only because everyone seems content to wander in a
direction where the multiplier
