On 09/11/2007, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > A thought on this - should it not go in contrib/tsearch2 replacing the old
> > deprecated stuff, instead of creating yet aother contrib dir?
It can be moved - no problem.
>
> That was the idea,
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A thought on this - should it not go in contrib/tsearch2 replacing the old
> deprecated stuff, instead of creating yet aother contrib dir?
That was the idea, I thought.
This proposed patch is in need of review, which I'd been hoping to get
to tomor
A thought on this - should it not go in contrib/tsearch2 replacing the old
deprecated stuff, instead of creating yet aother contrib dir?
/Magnus
> --- Original Message ---
> From: Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: 07-11-09, 01:35:49
> Subj
wait two days, please.
Pavel
I'll send finished patch on Sunday.
On 09/11/2007, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Should I apply this or wait for a final version?
>
> ---
>
> Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> >
=?UTF-8?B?SmFuIFVyYmHFhHNraQ==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The solution I came up with was simple: write a dictionary, that does
> only one thing: looks up the lexeme in a stopwords file and either
> discards it or returns NULL.
Doesn't the "simple" dictionary handle this?
Hi,
the rationale for this patch is rather complicated, as it's related to
the peculiarities of Polish grammar. Please read on.
I'm using PostgreSQL 8.2.4 and the ispell tsearch2 dictionary. The
problem is as follows. In Polish (and possibly other languages that
don't come to my mind at the momen
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Could we maybe have some flavor of ROLLBACK that doesn't issue a warning
> > if no transaction is in progress? There is precedent for this sort of
> > facility - DROP ... IF EXISTS.
>
> Something that would actually be doable for 8
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> One possible real solution would be to tweak the dictionary APIs so
> >> that the dictionaries can find out whether this is the first load during
> >> a session, or a reload, and emit notices only in the first case
Albert Cervera i Areny wrote:
> I attach the patch for the contrib docs. Mainly it's been formatting the
> README files of each directory into SGML.
>
> I've removed TODOs, history, licenses (all of them are BSD AFAICS), file
> descriptions and install instructions (I only left one for them all)
Should I apply this or wait for a final version?
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am sending light wrapper of integrated fulltext. API is compatible
> with tsearch2.
>
> Regards
> Pavel Stehule
>
> ToDo: rewrite fun
10 matches
Mail list logo
