On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Alex Hunsaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:23:03PM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 7:04 AM, Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:23:03PM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I think that the glacial speed for generating a big hash index is
>> > th
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:27 AM, Alex Hunsaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What locale did you use? It would be nice to have also comparing between C
>> and any UTF8 locale. I think we should see big benefit when non C l
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 13:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> ISTM that it would probably be better if there were exactly one InRedo
> flag in shared memory, probably in xlog.c's shared state, with the
> postmaster not being responsible for setting or clearing it; rather
> the startup process should do th
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What locale did you use? It would be nice to have also comparing between C
> and any UTF8 locale. I think we should see big benefit when non C locale is
> used.
Err yes this was UTF8, Ill see about doing a C locale.
--
S
Hello Jaime,
It is taking longer than I expected to implement the scalarltsel and
scalargtsel functions for the unsigned integer data type.
I am still working on this solution and hope to have an updated patch
later this week (or over the weekend at the latest).
Just wanted to keep you updated on
Alex Hunsaker napsal(a):
wide:
# NOTE not on the same machine as the "narrow" test was run!
# spit out 2, 000, 000 random 100 length strings
perl gen.pl > data.sql
create table test_hash (wide text);
copy test_hash from './data.sql';
create index test_hash_num_idx on test_hash using hash (wide
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 07:23:03PM -0600, Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that the glacial speed for generating a big hash index is
> > the same problem that the original code faced.
>
> Yeah sorry, I was not saying it
